<p>I got admitted to R as a transfer in the BusAdmin major. You guys are right. After visiting the place I got the sense of disregard and lack of initiative. I went in the afternoon on a weekday and the campus and dorms were pretty much dead. The libraries were very sparsely occupied with the majority of students not studying but rather looking for a place to socialize - in the library of all places. Marijuana seemed to be the popular substitute to books.</p>
<p>The campus seems pretty unkempt and the architecture wasn't very inspiring. In fact the whole UCR scene is rather uninspiring. The students I met weren't the brightest people, nor did they have any demeanor of potential. And when talking to them, I could see in their eyes that they were silently screaming for me to get them the hell out of there. To them, college wasn't a learning opportunity, but rather a dreary process that was supposed to deliver them to greener fields. UCR quickly dispelled this myth and they were left there waiting for the rescue boats. Hence the descriptions of "disregard" and a "lack of initiative." In a place where the herd mentality reigns supreme, it's hard not to be drawn into the Riverside abyss of apathy and helplessness. </p>
<p>There really isn't much here to do except study, and "who in their right mind would want to do that? I mean you're only in college." Not a lot of self-motivated research going on here. I felt like I was on a high school campus. Kids don't really come to UCR to learn, they come here to be conferred a degree and then jet. If school spirit or campus participation are important to you, look elsewhere.</p>
<p>Pentland was OK but just because a building is nice, doesn't make its inhabitants any more sophisticated than they already are. </p>
<p>Then when reading most of the posts of UCR students defending their school against the bashers, I regret even more that I didn't commit more time and effort in applying to another school. Not the brightest of the lot here. I'm not going to name names but some of your guys' rebuttals were an insult to yourself, even when you were trying to defend your own intellect. I mean even humility warrants respect, but to continue with an argument that you obviously lost a mile back...</p>
<p>You might be the brightest in your family or neighborhood, but that doesn't really say much. Especially when the majority of the student population comes from a low income background. And I got the sense that these kids didn't really value a degree or an education. I've met my fair share of UCR students and alumni and they really don't go anywhere. In fact I know a guy who enlisted in the military a year or so short of graduating. How does that even register? And a lot of students have likened their experience to "4 more years of high school" rather than a college one.</p>
<p>But this is just a superficial opinion based on only a few of the many factors that a university consists of. However, from an objective perspective (mine), the school is barely hanging on. </p>
<p>The financial figures show that UCR gets the least of government funding in the UC system by a large amount, and I found this on the UCR website. A school on its knees trying to increase enrollment to compensate for the lack of funding. How in the world did they miss this? I'm sure prospective applicants really want to see that your school is getting the butt end of taxpayer money. And if these applicants have an IQ greater than that of mayo, they'll realize more money equals better quality faculty, facilities, and just a better college experience in general. Good going UCR, you just dropped yourself 20 spots in the rankings.</p>
<p>When you go to the website, when you go through the orientation, whatever you do, it's all an act - if you already didn't know it. They just want you to sign the contracts, pay, and then they drop you and look for more money. Can't say much about the faculty, but I'm sure it's nothing great - the quality is probably at the level just sufficient enough to keep the funding coming. </p>
<p>Now my point:</p>
<p>I know as many, if not more UCLA students than I do from UCR. And I can say that there really is no difference except the typical UCLA student is fatter than the typical UCR student. Might be the dorm food but other than that, there really is nothing separating the two. Both are of equal intellect (stupid) and both really have no idea what they're going to do after college, or how they can apply their degree to a career. I also know two guys from Berkeley, both are also the same. One just graduated and sits at home doing nothing. The other is of mediocre intellect and only got a job because of his degree. I know USC students who should've stayed another year in high school. </p>
<p>What I'm saying is that there really is no concrete difference between these schools. Sure, the numbers might say different, but I'm speaking to you guys from personal experience. Which of you can honestly say that you know what goes on in the process of calculating said numbers? Who knows what kind of politics go into an multi-billion dollar industry like the college industry? So don't believe all the numbers. Believe me.</p>
<p>Ok, there may be some differences. One is that UCR gets bashed on a lot and this affects its students by making them feel inferior to those from other, more well-regarded schools. In turn they keep their mouths shut from contributing to the campus or society due to a lack of confidence and because they are afraid that they'll manifest the claims made about them. But I've met kids from UCLA and they aren't the brightest people, but they have this air of superiority that comes with their alma mater. This gives them the confidence to speak their mind because "I graduated from UCLA and so I know what I'm talking about." This rings true for USC as well. You'd be amazed at the types of people I've met at SC. It's a private school, so they commit a lot more money into enrollment compared to the UC schools. </p>
<p>So I'll be going to UCR not because it's such a great school, but because I like to root for the underdog. I like to hear success stories from those that came from the bottom. And in this case, UCR seems to be from there. I've done the research, and as a BusAdmin major, all the resources I need to get where I want to go are there. It doesn't really matter where you went to school, because in the working world, your actions speak for itself. Why do you think companies conduct interviews? It's not like they just sit there with you talking about how great your school was.</p>
<p>Some more stuff:</p>
<p>The UCLA campus is huge, which is why they get better funding. You also have to consider all the research facilities on the LA campus that also run on school money. I chose UCR because I don't want to walk a mile to class everyday. </p>
<p>The reputations of schools seem to perpetuate themselves. Meaning, a smart kids would rather go to a "smart" school over a "dumb" one. Which is why certain schools can constantly associate themselves with notable alumni and others with McDonald's employees. Companies pick up on this and might take it into consideration when hiring somebody. So the bias does exist but it is not universal. </p>
<p>UCR has all the standard amenities and resources that any high-class institution should have. It's up to you to find them and milk them for everything they're worth. But most of you just sit on your ass and complain wanting everything handed to you on a silver platter. The value is not in the degree, it's in the journey - the education.</p>
<p>What you learn is more important than what a piece of paper says. Do you think managers are idiots who'll hire anyone who graduated from a prestigious school? </p>
<p>Ok I know this post was super long and unorganized but I spoke my peace and hopefully I have given you, the reader, something of worth. If I wasted your time, then feel free to bash on my entry or add to it. I don't really care.</p>