<p>Do you know which one was the experimental? 2 or 6?</p>
<p>i think it was 2 nd 5. I hope 5 was.</p>
<p>i had three writing sections. 2 for me was a CR passage though. what were some examples of questions?</p>
<p>umm i'm really sorry but my brain isn't working right now... :/</p>
<p>I hope it was section 2. I omitted 3 due to my poor pacing through the section.</p>
<p>And for those with three writing sections which math grid-in did you get?</p>
<p>both were pretty easy. And, i was confident on each of them. So i dont really care or maybe i do since i probably didnt score equal :/</p>
<p>btw i had sections 2,5</p>
<p>i had the math grid in with the president in 1983</p>
<p>but i put down 1982 like an idiot. 2 wrong on math sucks !</p>
<p>i would think the 5th one would be the experimental, because collegeboard wouldn't put the 2nd section as an experimental, right?</p>
<p>One of the may version of the SAT had the 2nd section as experimental</p>
<p>yeah section 2 turned out to be experimental</p>
<p>"i would think the 5th one would be the experimental, because collegeboard wouldn't put the 2nd section as an experimental, right?"</p>
<p>What kind of reasoning is that?</p>
<p>PsychedelicSushi, so section 2 writing on the june SAT was indeed experimental?</p>
<p>wasn't reasoning, but an assumption.</p>
<p>it was "confirmed" by the huge discussion thread.</p>
<p>confirm that, genius</p>
<p>sorry my bad, just going along with what some people from the discussion board said. :/</p>
<p>wait gah, i'm confused. i think that i had my writing (section 2) was experimental, and the other one (section 6) was the real one. so i guess the discussion board was right?</p>
<p>yep, that's was the board said</p>