<p>dont remember but i thought they were ridiculously hard to follow and just generally stupid.</p>
<p>It was him lol- first passage was his friend - 2nd was someone else.</p>
<p>individual sections are the same in all tests right? just dif. combinations of them</p>
<p>The one about the area of the triangle was simple... You just needed to know how the length of the sides correspond with the angle measurements.</p>
<p>i didn't have sb woo. i had something about a grandpa's war experience and something else which i can't even remember</p>
<p>The one about the machines, was it to talk about how machines will take over our lives?</p>
<p>I think author was against that perspective- imo.</p>
<p>not really take over but kinda sorta</p>
<p>Do you mean the one describing machines' "emotions"?</p>
<p>didn't have the machine, or sb woo, or grandpa in war</p>
<p>i had one werid reading passage about asian sighting</p>
<p>i had the machine and monkeys but nothing else previously mentioned.</p>
<p>does anyone think they got the chairs question?</p>
<p>i think they have a set of real sections, and a set of experimental ones</p>
<p>then they just pull out sections from those two</p>
<p>ya i know- i meant did anyone think they got it right</p>
<p>when can we discuss the specifics?? i wanna know wut the chair question was about</p>
<p>When Can We Talk About Specifics</p>
<p>is the curve according to performance based on those sections or the whole test?</p>
<p>that seems really, really unfair.</p>
<p>math, CR, writing each has its own scale/curve</p>
<p>I honestly think I got the chair question pretty quickly.... I don't know if I can post specifics though.</p>
<p>i think we can discuss the specifics once we get our scores.
As for me, lets just say i plan on changing my screen name to CRBOMBER600. I messed it up.</p>