Top 5 Nobel laureates rankings by university affiliation

[keihanna]

<p>good try, though.</p>

[manhattaniter]

<p>

Fifty years ago this month, California promised a low-cost, high-quality university education for every qualified high school graduate in the state. But that promise — inflated by growing populations and academic aspirations — expanded beyond the state’s willingness to pay for it.</p>

<p>What went wrong? How did the university system that was long the envy of the world suddenly become the focus of angry street protests, overcrowded classrooms, soaring tuition and a monumental debate over whether the state can ever make good again on its groundbreaking mission?</p>

<p>While the recession turned a slow-brewing problem into an instant crisis, a Mercury News analysis of California’s higher-education mess reveals that many factors drove the inevitable and ugly collision between the university system’s ambitious and uncoordinated growth and the state’s declining ability and desire to pay for it. Among the most critical:</p>

<h1>Plummeting state support: Since 1990, state spending per student has dropped by half in inflation-adjusted dollars. While the state paid about 90 percent of a student’s education 40 years ago, it now pays 69 percent for California State University students and 62 percent for those in the University of California system.</h1>

<h1>No guaranteed funding: Unlike K-12 education, universities are not guaranteed a steady stream of funding. In the last 40 years, higher education’s piece of the state’s spending pie has been sliced in half — even while enrollment has jumped 2 1/2 times.</h1>

<h1>Continued expansion: In the past eight years, despite declining state support, UC added a new campus, seven new schools and at least 45 new programs. Cal State added a campus, many new science centers and even a Ph.D. program — adding a research emphasis that was not part of its original mission.</h1>

<h1>Little coordination: While university systems in several other states must seek approval for spending and expansion plans, there is no oversight body in California with the formal authority to play such a role. UC and Cal State are often self-advocates with competing interests — instead of partners that share and coordinate the state’s higher education needs, according to the state’s Legislative Analyst’s Office.

</h1>

<p>Source: San Jose Mercury News (California’s University System: What Went Wrong?)</p>

<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1064668836-post146.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/1064668836-post146.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

[keihanna]

<p>Hey Manhattan
Are you a Stanford student?
I lived in Branner and Wilbur.</p>

[manhattaniter]

<p>

@keihanna

Hey Manhattan
Are you a Stanford student?
I lived in Branner and Wilbur.

</p>

<p>Hey Keihanna
Are you a member of the British royal family?
I lived in Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle.</p>

[manhattaniter]

<p>

@keihanna

Log in Stanford ALumni online.(if you have a friend or know somebody from Stanford)
<a href=“System Message”>System Message;

<p>go to find a alum
Alumni Directory Search
put A and 500 comes out</p>

<p>This is an order I will omit last name for Privacy. </p>

<p>Mr. Alden 1907 History </p>

<p>Mr. Arthur AB Geology </p>

<p>Mr. Alfred </p>

<p>Miss Anne 1909 AB Latin </p>

<p>Mrs. Allan (formerly Ms. Patricia )1948 AB Psychology </p>

<p>Mr. Andrew 1896 Undergraduate Law </p>

<p>Mr. Arthur 1931 AB Economics </p>

<p>Major Arnold 1937 AB Pre-clin Medical Sci

</p>

<p>Does your Stanford friend or relative know what you’re doing with this privileged access?</p>

[keihanna]

<p>very funny.
It is obvious that you are not a Stanford student.</p>

<p>Oh, well.</p>

[manhattaniter]

<p>

@keihanna

Also is it one of the reasons you go to elite Schools to learn from the Nobel Laureates?

</p>

<p>I’m pretty sure that’s not why students attend elite LACs (Amherst, Williams, Wellesley, etc.) But you should probably ask them.</p>

[manhattaniter]

<p>

@keihanna

It is obvious that you are not a Stanford student.

</p>

<p>I don’t derive my sense of self-worth or identity from where I went to school. Nor do I care where anonymous strangers on the internet think I went to school. But unlike some people, at least I don’t pretend to go somewhere that I didn’t just so I can bash the school better.</p>

[keihanna]

<p>Quote:<br>
manhattaniter
How do you like 'em? 16 to 8, baby!! </p>

<p>Then why are you bragging about Stanford?</p>

[manhattaniter]

<p>

@keihanna

Quote:
manhattaniter
How do you like 'em? 16 to 8, baby!! </p>

<p>Then why are you bragging about Stanford?

</p>

<p>Because I love my school!!! Just as you should try loving Berkeley instead of pretending to be a Stanford alum. That’s just so sad.</p>

[GoldAngealArea]

<p>^lol thats kinda what i told this faker keihanna.</p>

[keihanna]

<p>Quote:
The data you cited from your above link missed Cornell University in the initial two top 10 lists.you missed out caltech, with 17 graduates being Nobel laureates, and 32 prizes in total (tied with princeton) </p>

<p>With Caltech & Cornell</p>

<p>Top 11

1. Columbia 97
2. Chicago 85
3. MIT 80
4. Harvard 74
5. Berkeley 66 </p>

<ol>
<li>Stanford 51
7.Yale 49 </li>
<li>Cornell 42
9.JHU 33
9.NYU 33
11.Caltech</li>
</ol>

<p>Top 12 Graduate Only

1. Harvard 45
2. Columbia 38
3. Chicago 29
4. Berkeley 26
5. MIT 26</p>

<ol>
<li>Yale 18</li>
<li>Caltech 17</li>
<li>JHU 15</li>
<li>Cornell 13</li>
<li>Princeton 13</li>
<li>NYU 8<br></li>
<li>Stanford</li>
</ol>

[manhattaniter]

<p>You know you’ve lost when you’ve resigned to copying and pasting the same stuff over and over and over again. What a one trick pony!</p>

[keihanna]

<p>Lost? I’m just ignoring you.</p>

<p>Manhattan? Stanford ? I doubt it. </p>

<p>Nice try though.</p>

<p>This is about Gold Angel</p>

<p>Date of Birth
February 29, 1992 (18) </p>

<p>You are 18 years old</p>

<p>Quote<br>
RML, I’m still a little unconvinced with your argument…but nice try. I was very unimpressed with the student quality at Berkeley. I was a biotech major and I was very depressed with the classes and the computer course I had taken. I switched out to UPenn and felt much happier with my life and my peers around me. </p>

<p>Quote:
"I keep hearing HYPSM are the best universities in America on these boards. But I’m sure there are universities a “step” right under them. Is there an acronym for them? I’m new to this so…and I don’t think I’m competitive enough for HYPSM admission. "</p>

[keihanna]

<p>Manhattan just joined CC three days ago .
Very Impressive.
And pretending you are Stanford Related?</p>

<p>I used to live in 52nd and 3rd(E) in NY.</p>

<p>Manhattan.
Join Date
10-25-2010
Total Posts
38</p>

[keihanna]

<p>[Berkeley’s</a> Prize For Nobel Winners: Free Parking : NPR](<a href=“http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=113883274]Berkeley’s”>Berkeley's Prize For Nobel Winners: Free Parking : NPR)</p>

<p>Winning a Nobel Prize is difficult enough. But on the campus of the University of California, Berkeley, there is something that might be even more difficult to get: a parking space on the central campus. </p>

<p>That’s why Berkeley has made it a practice to offer its Nobel laureates an extra-special perk: a free lifetime permit to park in the highly coveted spaces near the central campus. The spots would normally cost about $1,500 a year.</p>

<p>Berkeley professor Oliver Williamson won the Nobel Prize in economics earlier this week. He’s been showered with the congratulations from colleagues and students. But, perhaps even better, he’s getting that Berkeley parking perk. </p>

<p>It’s a temporary permit," Smoot explained. “You’ve got to renew it every year — like your Nobel laureate’s going to go away, or something! And so, twice now I’ve gotten tickets because I didn’t, you know, remember to renew it on time.”</p>

<p>But Williamson says a little paperwork will not discourage him from getting the permit.</p>

<p>“I think it ought to be automated, but apply if I must, apply I will,” he said.</p>