Another update! I’m case anyone is comparing the two schools, regardless of gender stuff.
We visited Haverford today. We liked Haverford, but my daughter and I both ultimately preferred Bryn Mawr.
The campus was pretty but not AS pretty. The students seemed very nice and smart.
I would say overall most of the students I saw (there weren’t that many probably because it’s so close to the Easter) looked a little less “alternative.” I think I’m really showing my age with that word. But it’s the best word that fits. Most of the students I saw at Bryn Mawr had a sort of quirky style. Haverford was a little more understated?
What was really missing was that sense of tradition we felt at Bryn Mawr. You could just kind of feel the difference? And there was something palpably a little different with guys on campus. We ended the tour by the gym, where there were quite a few guys working out. It’s not that there was anything bad about it. It just felt a bit more conventional.
Haverford had some very nice facilities, and I felt like more of the buildings were more updated. (Although the castle-y kind of feeling at Bryn Mawr is really cool!) The fine arts are housed there, and they had a very nice building with a makerspace we saw.
Ultimately, if you attend either of the two, it seems like you often take classes at both. So, I’m very glad we saw it. And everyone also was very friendly, and the students we talked to were clearly very intelligent and passionate about learning. I couldn’t say anything bad about the school. If anything, I guess I found it even more reassuring that the schools were sort of linked so there were more people and social opportunities. I do think maybe Haverford felt a bit more serious? But I think that feeling can be influenced by your tour guide. Our tour guide was very nice but a little more on the serious side than our guide at Bryn Mawr.
But between the two, there was something special about Bryn Mawr that is hard to put my finger on. I even asked our guide if she felt the vibes were different, and she said yes, and that she felt it had to do with the traditions and of course not being co-ed, but that she also found it hard to describe.
Tomorrow we see Swarthmore. My kid is not likely to get in (very high reach for almost anyone) and probably will not even apply. But since they are so close and you can even take classes there (although it seems like fewer students do because of the distance and space), it seems worthwhile, if just to give another comparison between these SLACs.
Thanks for all of the advice. I hope my little subjective reviews will be of some use to someone else!