<p>tzfilm,</p>
<p>Congrats!!! LMU for film production? What? Great job kid, that’s really terrific!</p>
<p>Hmm, then you had to go and ask me to pick between Chapman and LMU. Well I’m no expert but I have spent a lot of time on both campuses and I’m one of those Dads that asks a lot of questions. So here goes…</p>
<p>Both film schools are very VERY highly ranked and each year they turn out a new crop of very talented and well taught film students. Both schools are very difficult to get into and as such they tend to end up with smart and gifted young freshmen which increases their chances of growing them into great film makers and writers.</p>
<p>I would say that the film programs at these two schools are more or less at equal. To me your question is similar to asking an English major which Ivy, Brown or Dartmouth, they would choose. Hmm, sort of the long way of saying both Chapman and LMU are great. These are both “Film Ivy’s” (copywrite Wheaty 2010).</p>
<p>There’s been much discussion in the other thread about rankings. My personal ranking would look like this:</p>
<p>USC Tier 1
—gap—
UCLA Tier 2*
NYU Tier 2
LMU Tier 3
Chapman Tier 3</p>
<p>And then a whole bunch of very good programs for tier 4.</p>
<p>But let’s be clear about all this ranking stuff - ALL of the above programs are excellent and offer students the ability to become truly GREAT film makers and writers. All of them. </p>
<p>But this isn’t what you want to hear, you want to know which is better. I dunno. If my younger daughter were accepted to both programs (I would be thrilled!) my advice to her would be to go drive over and spend a lot of time at both programs. Ask the people in Admin if you can sit in some classes. Ask other students a lot of questions. Talk to the professors. Talk to the Admin people. Eat in the cafeterias. In short, become an expert on both programs and schools.</p>
<p>After all that just sit back and ask yourself which one feels like a better fit. That’s your answer.</p>
<p>So a true congratulations to you for getting a ‘yes’ from LMU! </p>
<p>Best,
Wheaty</p>
<ul>
<li>I put an asterisk next to UCLA for two reasons: 1.) you can’t be admitted to their film school until you’re a Junior. 2.) Their undergrad program is so small and selective that in my mind it’s really an extention of their MFA program. It’s sort of an MFA-lite if you will. Because of these two things I feel it’s difficult to rank this program for an incoming Freshmen. I put them in my own personal Tier 2 due to their end-product, the number of graduates that go on to do outstanding work in the film/TV business.</li>
</ul>