<p>even a mit 4.0 does not have an advantage over a nyit 4.0 come promotion time. he might have an edge getting in though.
As I said earlier, there is more to a successful life to a degree from a top 20 school. It would make sense if promotions are given according to ones success while they work, what college they went to wouldnt be a direct reason. However, like you said, actually getting the job is the important is where the college really comes in. </p>
<p>at my corp the majority of the senior executives are not ivy league grads I know nothing about your corp so I cant really say anything but its important to keep in mind that there are a lot of other colleges perhaps better than the Ivy League colleges, and there is a limit to how many students graduate from those particular schools and that whole number is nowhere near the number needed to say all execs from corps have graduated from an ivy league school. Nonetheless, a degree from a school that is more known (ivy or other top schools) will have a higher shot at a (perhaps initial) job, which will pave the way for their career, all things being equal. I am in no way saying that a b.s. degree from NYIT is worthless compared to one from Stanford, but to say that they are equal when looking for a job still doesnt register for me.
well ok, a handful of names have special effect on people. mit, harvard ... but i was talking in the context of the more than 1000 colleges and universities in the country. michigan is not mit
Your ( nguye89) statement (a 4.0 from nyit will get you where a 4.0 from anywhere else) was what I was arguing against. Just as how Michigan is not MIT, NYIT isnt UMich. </p>
<p>so? most people have never heard of harvey mudd, rose-hulman or cooper union. yet everyone has heard of louisiana state or fresno state. is that how you select schools
Um, no. I never said that thats the way I choose my college. UB-Vinny77 said that NYIT is a pretty darn reputable school. I went to a NYC HS and a lot of colleges were talked about but I never heard of NYIT. I would suspect (not sure) that most NYIT are in-state and the school would most likely try to get in-state students, and being a NYC HS student I had not heard of them from any of my teachers, guidance counselors, friends, or resources (book/internet). I had only seen an ad for it once. Therefore, from my personal experience and point of view, the school isnt that reputable compared with many other schools that I have looked into. I also find it funny that Ive heard of Harvey Mudd and Cooper Union (which I thought was fairly prestigious and competitive) and never heard of Louissiana State or Fresno State. But like I said, I never mentioned anything about selecting my schools based on how many of my friends heard of it or how many ads Ive seen. In fact, most of my friends dont even know that much about the schools Im applying to transfer into.
i don't think so. for undergrad you need good teachers, not nobel laurates who spend most of their time on research. you dont have to be at chicago to learn about the theory of one of its laurates.
In terms of the academic background of a professor, Im assuming a Nobel Laureate would be more knowledgable about a subject than most professors. That doesnt mean that they will necessarily be a good teacher. But UB-Vinny77 said that profs from NYU and Columbia are the very best. I assumed he meant best as in academically, in which case a Nobel Laureate would probably be better, or am I wrong? A good teacher is more than the professors education though and none of us can give a perfect argument saying that UChicago profs are better than NYIT profs because there are a lot of variables such as teaching style, class size, environment and blah blah blah. While your probably correct that a lot of Nobel Laureates spend a lot of time researching, you cant conclude that they dont spend enough time with their students and I cant argue that they do, just the same with us not being able to say that all NYIT profs spend enough time with their students. </p>
<p>Two of your quotes:
i can tell you that a 4.0 from nyit will get you where a 4.0 from anywhere else
i don't think anyone was saying that. nyit is definitely no mit
You contradicted yourself. </p>
<p>Its all about money and those dumb enogh to fork over 30+k for a elite education our wasting their money.
Its a lot about priorities, expectations, and goals imo. Im not going to go into a whole essay about why great colleges are worth their price tag, but just keep in mind that some people have other reasons to go to such a college besides the professional aspect (not to say that that isnt the most common one). I go to CUNY Baruch and only pay about 2G semester, but Im looking to transfer to schools that cost 30+k. I guess Im just too dumb to look for more. More at what cost you may ask but whatever my choice is mine to make and yours is yours to make.
id also like to point out that the majority of engineers hired in Ny metropolitan area are not taken from columbia or other schools like it.</p>
<p>They come from Manhattan college, NYIT, Polytechnic, cuny queens and city and NYIT.
Id like to see your sources. Not because I dont believe you, and I dont, but Im just curious. Im not even an engineering major.
NYIT gives a ton of sholorships to many students, many more than your name brand colleges. maybe the student was a ESL student or maybe a international one. almost every student gets a scholorship to NYIT, due to the huge donations it gets from succesful alumni.
And why do they give donations? To get more students just like many other schools. With comments like your name brand schools and your overall tone it feels like you think this is a battle or I hate you NYIT and Im all for these name brand colleges. Like I said, Im not bashing NYIT, Im bashing the thought that its the same as the name brand colleges. </p>
<p>also as for employers not knowing about NYIT, your pretty much insane for saying that.
Im insane? Maybe you should have your eyes checked as I didnt say anything like that. How about you fix that hostile attitude too? </p>
<p>Obviously I have way too much time on my hand
stupid Sunday nights.</p>