<p>First off, this is written by an overly ambitious HS senior, so feel free to mock me, lol.</p>
<p>Next year I'll be enrolling in UC Berkeley CoE as a bioeng major (though I'm probably gonna change my major to another eng, but w/e, not important atm; possibly with business/econ as well) which, considering Cal's rankings, isn't something to be complaining about. However, from what I've heard from my friends at both Cal and at elite private schools, it seems that there's a huge gap between Cal and the others in terms of general academic experience. I mean I've heard a lot about Cal's social life but given that I really don't care about that, it isn't really a plus for me at all. I'm definitely excited to go but I think there's a lot to be wished for in terms of individual attention and quality of academic instruction.</p>
<p>Obviously right now I have no idea whether or not I'll like it, since I've only visited once, but I'm definitely thinking about it. I have a solid HS transcript (4.0/4.7) in the top 1% of my school and I am hoping for a relatively decent one in college too (My school had 8-9 HYPSM admits last year from the top 1-2%, but it changed administrations this year, which I think kinda screwed us over. Everyone was rejected/WLed at HYPSM, including myself, and the only Ivy admit was at Cornell). I was admitted early as a Regents candidate so in context of Cal, I know I'm a fairly solid applicant.</p>
<p>I'm aware that transfer admission to either of those schools is even more of a crapshoot than it is for freshman, but I'm curious: If I do choose to apply as a transfer (which I would consider doing after freshman year) to a school like Stanford or MIT - probably the only ones I would apply to anyway, if I can tolerate Cal enough or at least enjoy it a little - would the fact that I'm coming from Cal CoE hold weight in the process? Given that I do well at Cal, do I at least have a decent shot or is it just a futile attempt at passing the 2%?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>