<p>MIT's transfer statistics is extremely low. How much difference does it make to MIT if they accept 7, rather than 6 people out of 500? I would think it doesn't make any difference to MIT if they accept 6 or 7 or even 9 people. I'm sure they can squeeze in 1 or 2 people if they really want the student.</p>
<p>So why does MIT only accept 6 students instead of say, 7? Let's think logically here...one possibility might be MIT ONLY want 6 student that year. Accepting 7 would be lethal to MIT. Even if there were 7 applicants who were all IMO gold medalists or Sieman finalist who are millionaires by 22, they would've still only accepted 6, not 7. In that case, I can see it's very competitive. But I kinda doubt that's how it works.</p>
<p>Another possibility is that only 6 students impressed MIT. MIT could've taken 7 or 8 students or even 10 students, but there just aren't enough that qualify.</p>
<p>Could MIT's unusually low statistics due to the fact that most transfer applicants are simply good but not great? I mean, I'm sure many of them are respectable in everyway, grades, scores, some activities, etc.. But I think MIT is more interested in students that can truly stand out and specialize in something rather than an "all around good student". </p>
<p>2 -3 % is pretty gloomy for anyone. But I guess it's not "that" bad if an applicant truly have something that stand out on a national scale. Because 480 out of 500 people won't have them.</p>
<p>I think my poor GPA can be a double edged sword. On one hand it's a liability. But on another hand, it can really make me truly stand out. Trust me, I will probably have the worst high school GPA out of all 500 applicants. For better or worse, I would have grabbed the admission's attention.</p>
<p>But then again, MIT admission director Marilee Jones once said, " My friend, a well-known pediatrician specializing in adolescent medicine, says that the #1 quality of successful and happy people is resilience - the ability to spring back from life's bumps and bruises. Since learning this I have thought that we colleges should really be asking applicants not just for your many successes but for your failures as well, to understand how much experience with resilience you've had. Certainly MIT students need resilience by the boatload because egos are challenged here every day. " </p>
<p>Well, it's safe to say I've made a "come back" in a phenomenal way. After high school, I've gotten a money making patent and a national invention award that was due to my effort during spare time. I also got a company running thanks to the capitals I've made from my invention. </p>
<p>In my sophomore year during college I flew to Cambridge to compete in a Boston physics competition and got in the top 10. On the score report it actuallys shows I beat the #3 guy from MIT. This is a nice compliment to my high school physics accomplishment (#1 in state)</p>
<p>BTW, I hate talking about scores since I think they are meaningless and won't make me stand out in any way. But just FYI I got 800s on SAT Physics and Math 2C too. </p>
<p>And my college GPA is pretty good too.</p>
<p>Therefore I think my experience is pretty unique and will definately make the admissions think "longer" than most of other applicants.</p>
<p>Think of it this way, the odds might be 1/50. But out of the 50 people, 30 of them will probabily be the type of students that MIT rejects right away...you know, the type with 1450 SATs, As and Bs, and a few weak activities.</p>
<p>Then 16 or 17 others will be the REALLY strong academic types...1550 SATs, straight As, good extracurriculars. These people might have a shot during freshman admission, but they are not special enough to transfer to MIT, simply because they do not have any NATIONAL recognition of any sorts.</p>
<p>Then we'll maybe have 2 or 3 people left out of every 50 people that MIT really try to choose from. </p>
<p>Seriously, if I were the director of MIT, I'd rather have a ambitious, capable student with a lot of fight in him who might someday "make it big" than a meek, straight A student who will be a "nice employee".</p>