<p>I’m curious why you all assume immediately that transparency has to come down to the individual student? Would not greater transparency into aggregate numbers be something that makes sense for a public institution? I would love to know more about the bottom third or quartile and why they are an imperative to the health and wellbeing of an institution or what qualities are essential for the middle of the pack that would preclude accepting students at the top of the pack. I would love to know more about the increasing numbers of out of state students and if money is the sole imperative, and exactly how much money that is in the revenue stream. How much are OSS being subsidized. All kinds of things that have nothing to do with reporting to an individual student applying to a public university.</p>