Tuition is now a useless concept in higher education

Examples of instructional costs per student:
(source:http://www.collegemeasures.org/4-year_colleges/college-performance-rank/#)

Private Universities
$100817 Yale
$95618 WUSTL
$88998 JHU
$81304 CalTech
$77816 Columbia
$67085 Vanderbilt
$66020 UChicago
$65044 Stanford
$55215 Duke
$44835 UPenn

$13736 Syracuse
$13707 Texas Christion
$13583 U. San Diego
$13578 UDenver
$13223 Northeastern
$12648 Baylor
$12646 Pepperdine
$12399 American
$12238 U San Francisco
$12038 U St. Thomas

Private LACs
$34588 Williams
$30845 Wellesley
$28918 Pomona
$27841 Bard
$26928 Middlebury

$13244 Illinois Wesleyan
$13146 Westmont
$13082 Willamette
$13081 Hobart Wm Smith
$13056 Bennington

Public Universities
$36961 UCLA
$26876 UNC-CH
$25566 Washington-Seattle
$24812 Illinois-Chicago
$24679 Penn State
$24403 Colorado-Denver
$22094 UCSD
$20761 Michigan-AA
$20552 Rutgers
$20404 UC-Davis

$8535 Nebraska-Lincoln
$8416 Louisiana State A&M
$8384 Illinois State
$8384 Oklahoma State
$8330 Bowling Green

There does appear to be some correlation between costs and academic quality (or at least, the USNWR/Forbes rank).
Various factors may be confounding this correlation (such as location, size & economies of scale, or the relative costs of graduate/professional school v. undergraduate faculty). Is Yale’s instructional quality 2x better than Duke’s? Probably not. Nevertheless, I do think one would tend to find significantly better instruction for similar classes from schools in the top cluster than from schools in the bottom cluster.

That answers the question, then.

Don’t forget the students. :slight_smile:

Yale chooses nothing but the best and brightest. Directional State Uni can and will enroll C students.