<p>@thenewkidaw71 - These are excellent questions, both from you and your parents. Some of my answers will contain assertions that I can back up, but it would take pages to do it on here. So hopefully they can accept some points I make as just “OK, I can believe that”.</p>
<p>The first big point, and this is really important, is that when it comes to research and rankings in all fields probably, but certainly in the sciences, it is all driven by graduate school and post-doc level work. There is absolutely, positively no such thing as a credible ranking system for undergraduate majors. Your parents are into stats and facts? Then I would challenge them to tell me what stats are available that could meaningfully measure how the chemistry department at OSU is better for undergrads than Tulane’s. For grad school? Sure. I did some graduate work in chemistry at a top-ranked school much like OSU, and there is no question it was stronger for getting a PhD than Tulane, as is OSU. But that isn’t what we are talking about here. It is easy to measure number of publications, how much money they get, how many grad students they have, so on and so forth. None of that is important at the undergrad level.</p>
<p>In fact, it is exactly that situation that makes Tulane such a great place to be an undergrad wanting to do research. Tulane is a member of AAU, a group of about 60 research level universities that are considered to be top-notch. <a href=“https://www.aau.edu/”>https://www.aau.edu/</a> OSU is a member also, of course. No matter what source you look at, Tulane is always considered a top tier research university. But since their graduate programs in some areas are much smaller than at OSU, the profs are very involved with the undergrads in doing research. I can tell you from my experience that the research groups at a place like OSU have many grad students, often 20, 30 even 40 or more, plus post-docs. The professor is so busy managing these people, writing papers, writing research grant proposals, consulting, and teaching (usually an upper level undergrad course or a grad level course, not intro courses) that they really don’t have much time for the undergrads. Now this is the “worst case” scenario (from your point of view) and there are certainly profs not in that situation, but their goal in a school like OSU is to get to that situation. It is not like that at Tulane.</p>
<p>So the very thing your parents are focusing on as making OSU seem more prestigious is the same thing that makes the experience for undergrads less satisfying. I know we had about 18 grad students (including me) in my group and 3 post-docs. We had no undergrads, and frankly I cannot remember any of the other groups having undergrads doing research either. There probably were a couple here and there, but I have to wonder what level projects they were given. In groups like that they are usually given the most boring and routine work. Again, not at Tulane. It is only anecdotal, but when I was doing my undergrad at Tulane, I had an idea for a line of research that my prof actually listened to. Now my idea was the seed and turned out well due to fairly dumb luck on my part. It mostly turned out well because he made a key suggestion to use one component that was different than what I was suggesting. The point is that it resulted in 3 publications in the top journals in the country, he gave me lead author credit on the first one because it was my suggestion that got it started, and it has been cited in hundreds of papers and several textbooks since then. I can say with 99.8% certainly that never would have happened at OSU.</p>
<p>This situation also means that the profs at Tulane are actually teaching the undergrad courses, even the intro level ones. It is another opportunity to get to know them. The Tulane faculty is very undergrad oriented.</p>
<p>It is hard to give you statistical evidence about undergrads doing research at Tulane, these things just don’t exist. But as a Tulane grad and a Tulane parent I can tell you it is definitely there. In an entirely different field, I remember a few years ago a 2nd semester freshman wrote me that she was thinking of transferring because she had become interested in an area of linguistics that Tulane didn’t have as a major or concentration. Long story, but I found out that a professor in another department was doing research that was very similar to what she was wanting and suggested she go talk to him. That next Monday she was in his research group on a project that was exactly what she wanted to do, and is now going to be a happy Tulane graduate going on to grad school at Michigan in this field. I know, just anecdotal, but there are a lot more like it.</p>
<p>I would point out that Tulane had 13 undergraduate Fulbright award winners last year, OSU had 16. That’s pretty elite. When you take into account that OSU is 9 times larger than Tulane for undergrad, Tulane beat their pants off, lol. They also had a couple of National Science Foundation Fellows. Tulane students know how to party, for sure, but they also know how to achieve great things academically. It just stands to reason that opportunities are a lot more accessible at Tulane for those that want them.</p>
<p>I don’t know if that helped, If I can clarify anything or answer anything else, let me know.</p>