<p>How profitable each publisher was was NOT the issue when Kaavya Viswanathan was accused of plagiarism. The legal issue is whether there is infringement. So far that claim still looks very dubious. </p>
<p>Moreover, the students ARE compensated. They can take their grades to the bank, knowing that they attended a school that verifies submitted papers for originality.</p>
<p>Sorry, but that claim holds no water. This is NOT a "work-for-hire" situation in favor of the school. The students PAY the school. Outside of the pornography industry, how many people do you know who PAY to be violated?</p>
<p>It seems to me that the existence of plagiarism is what drives the business of TurnItIn, so the only students who should be compensated are those whose essays are good enough to be copied. If no one copies anyone else's essay then Turnitin will go out of business. Turnitin.com should then charge the students whose essays are not plagiarized for storing their essays electronically since they are of no use to the company. Of course then the students who are caught plagiarizing will claim that the company incentivizes entrapment by creating an environment where students will willingly let others copy their essays.</p>
<p>Don't know much about the lawsuit, but an interesting fact:</p>
<p>The poli sci department at my school uses turnitin. We're in Canada, but because we turnitin is American, our essays (and whatever profile info we share) is subject to the Patriot Act. But, like some of the above posters mentioned, we have no choice - use the service or fail the paper.</p>
<p>Actually, I'm an author who has had my works plagiarized by students, which is why I care about plagiarism, and I am a lawyer by professional school education, which is why I find the legal theories here interesting. If a participant here has citations to law about copyrights, and an explanation of the legal theory under which Turnitin will be sued, I'd be glad to hear about it. </p>
<p>P.S. "He" would be the correct pronoun for referring to me in the third person.</p>
<p>"Ignore" functions as a monotransitive verb and requires a direct object. The pronoun should be in objective ("him"), not subjective form ("he).</p>
<p>
[quote]
"Ignore" functions as a monotransitive verb and requires a direct object. The pronoun should be in objective ("him"), not subjective form ("he).
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Of course I was referring to gender, not to case. But in fact the person to whom I replied also wrote "they're," using a contracted phrase with a pronoun in nominative (subject) form.</p>