<p>Once I made a big essay…BS
Topic: Do we need other people in order to understand ourselves?</p>
<p>We need other people to understand ourselves. Root “psychology” comes from Ancient Greeks. It means “clairvoyant”, someone who can foresee and explain to person who is he. Nowadays, people whose job is to help people to understand who they are in reality are named psychologists. This is another part of science – psychology. Among first psychologists were J. Franchat, A. John, J. Rivera, and others. Both Susan Hollander’s case and sportsmen, who take part in Olympic Games, clearly exemplify that we need psychologists to interpret who we are and what we should do in various situation.</p>
<p>Let us consider Susan Hollander’s case. She lived in Topeka, Kansas. Her love was Mr. Bagwell, who killed 6 students in Alabama and escaped to Kansas. The problem is that she didn’t know who he really is, and that his place is in prison. Accidently she was watching “America’s Most Wanted” and understood who he is. Then, in zenith of this case, she called 911 and her “love” was in jail. Susan H. had a bad feeling; not good ones… She couldn’t carry on her life with feelings that someone easily circumvented her. That is why Ms. Hollander suggested with psychologists. And their advice was to stand face-to-face with Mr. Bagwell and speak all she had on her mind. Eventually, she did so; after that, she had easily continued her daily life. Thus, did she need “other peoples” to understand who is she? The answer is definitely “Yes”. In the term “understand ourselves”, in this case, we take into account to extricate from hard psychological problem, to understand who we are in this case and what we should do.</p>
<p>Another good example is sportsmen who take part in Olympic Games. In any kind of competition they need psychologist’s help. Only one thought that you have been preparing four years for four minutes scares every participant. According to psychologist’s analysis the rule number one to do well is to close your eyes for how your opponents were, I mean, don’t look for other’s results, just do your job—to go and to win. Each sportsman should imbue himself that he is a winner, that he is the best, and nobody, for instance, skies better than he does. These all characteristics are creating “mood for success” and theoretically it refers to the “psychology”. Today, we can’t imagine skier without psychologist. Eugenie Plushenko is good confirmation to that theory. He won Olympic Gold Medal in 2005, and, in interview with his trainer, they explained that this Gold Medal is impossible without psychologist’s assistance. In addition, 2005 Analysis of Olympic winners shows that preparation and psychological inspire play equal part in sportsman’s success. Hence, one could conclude that it’s very and again very important to understand ourselves. This example, shows that people, whose job is to help understand people who they really are, is the one of the keys for the success.</p>
<p>After careful analysis of Susan Hollander’s case and participants in Olympic Games, we can see that we need others to understand ourselves. The nineteenth-century moralist’s view was that every person is “closed flower with ability to jump though hardships and to extricate from them” and we need “sun light and desire to go” to amaze surrounding people with “beauty and aroma of our flower”.</p>