<p>So I just got my scores, I got a 32 (35E 29M 35R 35S) 
I’m applying to Georgetown EA. Two quick questions.</p>
<li><p>I have a 1400/2100 SAT (straight 700s). My 32 is stronger, right?</p></li>
<li><p>Do the schools look mostly at the composite or the individual sections? If so, would my consistent 700s be stronger than my off-balanced ACTs, even though my English/Reading scores were INCREDIBLE? (Note: Applying to the School of Foreign Service where Reading/English skills are more needed)</p></li>
</ol>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
<ol>
<li><p>They're about equal (with a slight nudge towards the 32 being stronger on some comparison charts).</p></li>
<li><p>Depends on the school, but I wouldn't worry about a 29 in one section with a 32 composite (I'm in the same boat- 35M, 36S, 33R, and 29E (33 comp), but I'm an engineering applicant so I've got a similar imbalance like you do). What matters is what they ask for- if when they ask you to self report every section, then they're weighted equally; only composite, then that's what they want; but if they ask for something like math and english, that's generally the bias.</p></li>
</ol>
<p>I think you mis-reported one of your sub-sections because a 32 comp. doesn't make sense.</p>
<p>Ah I did! Whoops. 28 S haha.</p>
<p>^Yeah that would be a 34 comp.</p>
<p>
[quote]
even though my English/Reading scores were INCREDIBLE?
[/quote]
I'd guess it would be the science that was misreported?
I didn't even think you could get a 35 science- doesn't 1 wrong generally give you a 34?</p>
<p>Errr: cross posted</p>
<p>Yep johnson, I wrote it wrong. My bad!</p>