<p>I dealt mostly with less well known and less prestigious programs then places like NEC, MSM Indiana, North Texas etc. but I’d be happy to give you some information (as I think all these schools are very much worth looking in to). Its also important to note that even in the very modern programs, you’ll be learning straight ahead jazz for technique/repetoire purposes (meaning even if you end up playing autumn leaves in 7/4 on a gig, you’ll be learning the vanilla version first)</p>
<p>City College of New York
Great, small program. Extremely traditional and staight ahead and shares a good deal of faculty with MSM and Julliard. If you want to study straight ahead jazz in new york and want somewhere cheap and easier to get in to then the big schools, Id suggest this school.</p>
<p>NYU
Small program, kind of competetitive and EXTREMELY modern. I studied with one of the guitar professors there this summer (incedently; I studied with him then found out he teachers there) and I can say he completely transformed my playing in terms of time feel, fretboard knowledge and navigation of the changes, as well as helping me get my feet wet with inside/outside playing (a big part of the scene at and around NYU). </p>
<p>The New School
Bigger then NYU but otherwise very similar. Very modern and focused on developing a teacher-mentor relationship with players in the NY scene. A lot of really exciting players come out of here.</p>
<p>Berklee
Berklee has everything but classical. You study standards and straight ahead tunes in most classes, but most of the players are quite modern. Theres tons of opportunities in every genre, but the jazz players definatly lean towards the modern (but usually not quite avant garde) side of things.</p>
<p>Temple University
I really didn’t like boyer. It has some amazing faculty (though Dick Oates, who met with us at the information session came off as really stuck up and extremely stuck in the past—though an AMAZING player/teacher if your into that style. I later went to a masterclass of his and he came off the same way) and nice facilitites, but seemed very much focused on training performers to play in the 60’s and 70’s, the school also seemed a bit snooty (though maybe its just me). Though let me be clear: a very good school for straight ahead jazz. </p>
<p>The University of The Arts
(I go here now). The program is centered on straight ahead jazz, though there are performance opportunities in almost every genre, from classical to electronica. The players are very good, but (especially in the guitar, vocal and bass department) there are a good deal who aren’t yet solid jazz players, but have substantial experience in another genre and play at a fairly high level (and can fake their way through a chart). Theres also a good deal of modern playing opportunities (students play regularly at Chris’s a club right around the corner) and a lot of players who are leaning towards the more current side of things.</p>
<p>Belmont University
Defininatly more on the comercial side of things. The jazz program (like many in the south and non-california west) seems very straight ahead, and more on teaching you jazz to help you play commercial music. But if you want to be a session musician who can play some jazz, its a great school.</p>
<p>UMASS Amherst
I didn’t apply as I realized I had no desire to be in Amherst, MA, but its a solid program with solid faculty, though its definitly more straight ahead/traditional.</p>
<p>Loyola University New Orleans
(I attended here for a year). Really good faculty. I did not have one teacher who wasn’t great, and who wasn’t one of the top players in the New Orleans scene. The guitar teacher (and really the whole program) definatly leans towards the 50’s-60’s blue note sound, and the attitude of jazz as an aural and oral tradition (which, as far as I’m concerned is the only way to learn the more traditional styles without sounding like a jazz at lincoln center hack). If your interested in bop sound and want to develop it like most bop players did, I’d check out loyola. Its also a much more laid back school then many. THe downside is that the jazz department is very small (under 60 students), which is good as far as instruction goes, but less good as far as opportunities to play go. There also isn’t really a jazz theory sequence, just a one semester course called jazz theory and piano. But you can definatly get a solid hold on the more traditional repetoire and styles here and a good well rounded (if not especially modern or applicable to you if you want to play modern jazz in New York or Europe) musical education.</p>
<p>Musicians Institute
See belmont. I didn’t even end up visiting here. It used to be a great jazz program (had joe pass on faculty for a while in either the 70’s or 80’s) and If you’ve ever seen the instructional book Superchops, that was developed and used here. Now its definatly more focused on popular music and session playing, with jazz being used to ‘legitimize’ the education and give players a background with improvising through harder changes. Still, it seems like a great school for an aspiring session player. It seems like it may be a for-profit college, but I’m not sure.</p>