<p>Well, the number of in-state students is dropping, in percentage (19%) and total.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>However, that’s not really a “concern” as much as a policy question. At what % of enrollment do you set in-state students? </p>
<p>What could be a concern, and it’s not referenced in the article, is questions around resources. Does UA have the resources to support the increased number of undergrads? If not, we’ll see higher faculty to student ratios, larger classes, and issues signing up for required classes (which will push back graduation dates).</p>
<p>Does UA cap undergrad enrollment at some point, or do you they want to challenge schools like Arizona State University (58K+), and the University of Central Florida (52k+)?</p>
<p>By the way, these are the performance metrics being used by UA:</p>
<p>Well, we know that they have hired a very large number of new faculty members over the last ten years. And the percentage of classes with less than 20 students has risen, though the overall faculty/student ratio was 1/20 as of last Fall. So, it seems that the increase in the number of
Honors classes increases the number of classes with 20 or less. </p>
<p>As for the instate question, we don’t have the data in for that yet. One problem likely to create more controversy is that any raising of admissions standards will likely decrease the number of instate students. On the other hand, when that starts happening, it will probably make UA more attractive to the state’s top students. How the administrators balance these competing dynamics, will be very interesting. </p>