Further to excellent points raised in Posts #13, 16,18, and 20…I started this reply way early in the morning, and just got back to it now, so sorry if some of this is repetitive. I once again obviously have way too much time on my hands…
I want to ask you readers WHY the graduation rate is relevant for Honors vs non-Honors? Knowing that breakdown will provide you with what exactly? What concerns you about a low graduation rate? At UA, regardless if a student is in the HC or not, if that student is serious about graduating in 4 years, they can do so. Advising, or the lack of it, and not being able to register for classes, etc. are just excuses, plain and simple.
The point others have made about parents expecting your students to graduate within 4 years is a very powerful message. Heed it.
According to USN&WR rankings info…graduation rates of many southern schools are indeed troubling. I just picked a few baddies:
Auburn 42% grad rate in 4 years.
UA 39% grad rate in 4 years.
Ole Miss 37% grad rate in 4 years.
Georgia Tech 37% grad rate in 4 years.
UA-Birmingham 33% grad rate in 4 years.
UA-Huntsville 15% grad rate in 4 years.
Heck, even Texas A&M is only at 50% in 4 years.
As a parent 5 years ago I spent a great deal of needless time reading into grad rate statistics; I thought it was a measure of how enabled my son would be to graduate in 4 years…in other words, I didn’t want him to go to a school where he was unable to graduate due to not getting classes he needed, as a prime example. What I realised rather quickly is that grad rates mask many reasons that kids do not graduate, and they do not provide the info I was originally seeking by that statistic.
In certain majors (education, nursing, athletic training, PT, as examples), where clinical work is required, often students are taking a 9th or even 10th semester to fit it all in to graduate. In other programs, and engineering is the prime example here, there are co-ops encouraged, and those students who take those are not graduating in 4 calendar years.
I looked at Purdue, just out of curiosity, because that was one of the schools my son was interested in…and one of the schools I was most worried about him NOT graduating in 4 years because of not getting required courses (as something I had heard was a problem at the time). Purdue has “only” 46% graduating in 4 years. Hmmmm. Not even half. I was surprised by that. I looked at their 6-year grad rate, and Purdue’s is still “only” 74%. 1 in 4 Purdue students will not graduate in 6 years.
Similarly, Georgia Tech, with the abysmal 37% grad rate in 4 years…turns it into 82% graduating in 6 years…so I believe there is some validity to the notion that co-ops in engineering has a great deal to do with low 4-year grad rates.
So, let’s look at UA’s 6-yr rate from the USN&WR chart: it’s risen from 39% (4 year grad rate) to 66% graduating in 6 years Still, 1 in 3 UA students will not graduate in 6 years. That is still very troubling as a raw stat. I hesitate to even write about it, because I don’t have enough answers for why it is so, and I don’t want to paint UA in a bad light by any means.
If you look at the USN&WR chart, freshman retention rate is somewhat correlated to grad rates, but it’s not a predictor. The USN&WR chart has 22.5% of it’s ranking determined by retention rates, and another 7.5% of the ranking determined by graduation performance (predicted grad rate vs actual grad rate, after 6 years).
So here is the link. Keep in mind that this chart shows 6-year grad rates (not 4): http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/data
If you want 4 year grad rate data you’ll have to look at each school individually. Happy digging. Happy comparing.
If you want to look for reasons why you should not choose UA, you will no doubt find them, and for conscientious folk like those reading about UA here on CC, your fears will be addressed and assuaged. If nothing else, you can look back (after you have graduated in 4 or even 6 years) and say, wow, I’m one of the only 66% who graduated, and pat yourself on the back. :-bd