<p>Very true–just more proof that UChicago is one of the very best law schools, as we all know.</p>
<p>But this ranking is hardly a ‘gimmick.’ There are three main (long-established) ways to rank faculty quality in most fields, not just law:</p>
<p>1) reputation surveys among peers
2) faculty most published in top journals
3) faculty most cited in top journals</p>
<p>None of these ways of ranking schools is perfect. Each has flaws. One of the main drawbacks of reputation surveys is the ‘halo effect.’ There is a tendency, as your comments show, to say school X or Y is or isn’t a top school just because it is school X or Y–regardless of what other objective evidence reveals. (You could also dismiss all reputation rankings for similar reasons. U.S. News’ business school reputation ranking rated Stanford #14 in executive MBA programs, even though it doesn’t have an executive MBA program. Therefore, you could say all reputation surveys are BS and couldn’t possibly be true.)</p>
<p>[Wharton</a> Tops U.S. News’ Poll Of Best EMBAs | Poets & Quants for Executives](<a href=“http://poetsandquantsforexecs.com/2012/03/14/wharton-tops-u-s-news-best-embas/]Wharton”>Poets&Quants for Execs - Wharton Tops U.S. News' Poll Of Best EMBAs)</p>
<p>It is often the case that schools with certain reputations can’t sustain the claim based on other, objective criteria. UChicago doesn’t have this problem so I’m not worried about it.</p>
<p>Of course, there is nothing stopping people from using their brains and considering more than one piece of information or ranking. But if the evidence doesn’t support your favorite school’s press release or what your grandmother told you the best law schools are, then you have something to ponder.</p>
<p>2) Attempting to dismiss Coase because he is 101 years old or because he won the Nobel Prize in Economics would be laughable.</p>
<p>Shakespeare wrote 400 years ago. We don’t dismiss him for this reason. Indeed, if Coase’s article is still the most cited in 200 years it would be very much to his credit.</p>
<p>As you know, UChicago is known for Law and Economics and, of course, has far more Nobel prize winners in economics than any other school.</p>
<p>Furthermore, if UChicago was able to recruit him from UVA when he was in his prime, that is more to UChicago’s credit.</p>
<p>But I’m not trying to shut UVa or LSE out in the cold. People do have more than one affiliation often. All three schools can count him if they want; his high school could, too, and probably does. In any event, I imagine Coase would have something nice to say about the nearly 50 years he has spent at the University of Chicago (far more time than he spent anywhere else) if one were to ask him.</p>
<p>[Ronald</a> H. Coase | University of Chicago Law School](<a href=“http://www.law.uchicago.edu/faculty/coase/]Ronald”>UChicago - Sign In)</p>
<p>Institution’s have a past and a present to consider and UChicago Law School does very well in both regards.</p>
<p>And, for any one reading this, if you spend any amount of time at UChicago, I will be putting a little checkmark in the UChicago column for any of your accomplishments, even if you did your best work in kindergarten.</p>