<p>Two problems:</p>
<p>1) I REALLY like both Reed and UChicago, for some reasons that are the same and some that are different.</p>
<p>2) I think I have a pretty decent shot at getting into both of them, meaning I may have to choose... Not trying to sound conceited. Just trying to prepare myself for the best.</p>
<p>If I DO get into both, I definitely plan on visiting UChicago (already visited Reed), which will probably help me decide. But I'd like to get a bit of a head start, so...</p>
<p>REED: I visited, and it was AWESOME. I love the campus. I love the students. I love Portland, but that's just an added bonus. It definitely seems like a learn-for-the-sake-of-learning type place, given the number of students who go on to get their PhDs and its reputation for being academically challenging. At the same time, it isn't one of those ultra-competitive schools. It also has small, seminar style classes, which I really like, and seems sort of like a learning community, which is cool. The students do know how to have fun, though-- I saw fire spinning, an improv show, a freaking couch see-saw and a bunch of other stuff that was really cool. I sat in on a class and the students seemed involved (and interested). My interview with Reed was a REALLY good experience. But I am kind of worried about the limited course offerings. It's a smaller school, so obviously there aren't going to be as many options. But I'm interested in anthropology, and there are ZERO classes in South American or Eastern European anthropology-- the two areas I'm most interested in. It also may be a bit too small and a bit too far from home (east coast).</p>
<p>UCHICAGO: Haven't visited, but some of the reasons are the same. I THINK it's a learning-for-the-sake-of-learning type place, but I could be wrong. I KNOW it's academically challenging, but the core doesn't scare me. And the course guide is AMAZING. Really, really amazing. I love the idea of the quarter system. With such an awesome selection, who wouldn't want to take as many courses as possible? I read through it and highlighted all the courses I thought looked good (I know-- I need a life), and I don't think I'd even be able to take all of them on the quarter system. The anthropology department is also great, and there are opportunities for undergrads to get field experience, which is pretty cool. Apparently UChicago also has small discussion-based classes, which is close to the top of my priority list, so I hope it's true. My concern: not having visited the campus, I really have no idea what the atmosphere is like. I don't mind working hard and I don't mind stress, but I'm not at all a competitive person. I'm also not someone who is easily overpowered by stress, and people have given me the impression that UChicago is kind of a fun-free zone. I doubt this is completely true, but I thought the atmosphere at Reed was awesome-- intellectual and quirky all at once. I don't know if I'd get that from UChicago. Do lives exist outside of work? Would it be conceivable for something as awesome as a couch see-saw to exist at UChicago?</p>
<p>I don't know. Maybe the choice seems obvious to some of you, but I seriously have no idea. They're both good for similar but different reasons... Any insights (especially on UChicago's atmosphere)? Any other school suggestions? I'm also applying to Brown and Wesleyan... any opinions about them?</p>