<p>That is posted in the rejection letter. Did I read it wrong?</p>
<p>Son was accepted into engineering.</p>
<p>SAT I (breakdown): 2050 (Writing 670, Reading 760, Math 620)
ACT: N/A
SAT II: 750 English Lit., 700 Math II
UC Weighted GPA: 4.2 UW: 4.0
Rank (percentile if rank is unavailable): small school, 1 out of 32
AP - Not taken yet
IB (place score in parenthesis): N/A
Senior Year Course Load: heavy for school; 3 AP classes.
Major Awards (USAMO, Intel etc.): National Achievement Scholar</p>
<p>Extracurriculars (place leadership in parenthesis): (annual clothing drive), regular volunteer at soup kitchen, basketball, band, honor society tutor.
Essays: Very good
Location: Sacramento
Intangible: He has succeeded despite having narcolepsy (treated medical condition which involves excessive daytime sleepiness and cateplexy - REM paralysis intruding into daytime).</p>
<p>I WANT TO KNOW IF MY HYPOTHESIS FROM YESTERDAY WAS CORRECT - URSA with 3 COLUMNS = ACCEPTANCE and 2 = DENIAL</p>
<p>(This was true from last year - 2009 fall admission)</p>
<p>
Oh come on. The people with 5.0 GPAs and 2400 SATs aren’t even going to consider going to UCLA. They applied to this school as their backup college or for the unlikely chance that the university will offer a full scholarship.</p>
<p>D accepted for Astrophysics.
34 ACT
2160 SAT
4.0 UC GPA, 4.3 weighted GPA
Strong of EC’s for Science/Astronomy and Dance/Choir</p>
<p>***. 8% Acceptance?!!? </p>
<p>"For fall 2010, we received more than 57,000 applications for 4,690 available spaces for freshmen. "</p>
<p>"That is posted in the rejection letter. Did I read it wrong? "</p>
<p>They also factor in that their accepted students have many good options and only about a third (historically, but who knows?) will enroll. So they can accept three times the number of spaces available for freshman, or 14,070 of 57,000 applicants; 24%.</p>
<p><a href=“http://www.admissions.ucla.edu/prospect/adm_fr/Frosh_Prof09.htm[/url]”>http://www.admissions.ucla.edu/prospect/adm_fr/Frosh_Prof09.htm</a></p>
<p>haha, the blah blah blah lyrics made me lol :]</p>
<p>D got accepted today to UCLA. We’re very proud. Her stats:</p>
<p>SAT: Writing 800; Reading 800; Math 660
SAT Subjects: World History 780; Biology 760; US History 760
ACT: Composite 34
Weighted GPA: 4.34
Strong ECs and Recs, Very tough high school course load, about 10 AP classes
Cross Country & Track</p>
<p>When are we told about Regents decisions?</p>
<p>My S got accepted with Regents. So the Regents results should be out already.</p>
<p>See this post to find out about Regents
<a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-california-los-angeles/877937-ucla-admissions-acceptance-rejection-date-21.html#post1064288759[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-california-los-angeles/877937-ucla-admissions-acceptance-rejection-date-21.html#post1064288759</a></p>
<p>8% were not accepted. They expect that x amount (that nearly 5000 number) will matriculate</p>
<p>thank you orkinman; I just checked for regents :)</p>
<p>Congrats to svstudent for getting into UCLA!</p>
<p>Accepted (: as of today!</p>
<p>I probably have the absolute lowest SAT scores out of the fall 2010 acceptees, haha.</p>
<p>@JunkerRikert: Grats to him as well! :D</p>
<p>@livelovecheer - what’s your SAT? Mine was 1890 D:? and grats regardless!</p>
<p>I got rejected and am very confused as too why? Do they put an extreme significance on the SAT scores and completely ignore the application? It seems as if they did that to me… well what ever its their loss, cause they accepted some not so smart people from my school.</p>
<p>Not sure. But my friend got a >2200 SAT with many ECs, ~4.2 UC weighted GPA, didn’t get in.</p>
<p>@Ranka…i feel the same way. I’m really frustrated right noww…ima try to call UCLA on Monday to find out why they rejected me. Im sure we can do that</p>
<p>Actually I don’t know if you can call asking about why you didn’t get in. Mostly because they probably don’t have the time to be able to explain it to all of us :(</p>