<p>I don't know if everyone got to see this... but this really gave me a piece of mind. The UCLA rep says that as long as you fall above the average, you should feel better about your application.</p>
<p>Hahaha that information has been in this forum a lot but thank you for trying to share information this crucial piece of info. I was really excited when I found that too.</p>
<p>one rep did tell me that. however she also told me that if I don't finish my pre-req's by fall 2007 (I applied for fall 2008), then I would be less likely to be accepted to UCLA. The other rep told me that it's not the case and that the inital rep was a replacement from the general admissions office.</p>
<p>They also kept stressing that it depends on your major.</p>
<p>I believe the answer to the "million" dollar question would be above the average GPA of admits. Bear in mind that the GPA's are skewed by TAP applicants, probably making the average admit GPA lower than it is for non-TAP applicants. Last year we observed that no one on this board got into UCLA for Economics with less than a 3.8, unless he or she had TAP. If our hypothesis that 3.8 was the cut off is true, the listed average of 3.78 is then explained by TAP.</p>
<p>for some majors that are popular with UC to UC transfer also bear in mind that the admit gpa is lower than the average.</p>
<p>my friend applied for computer science linguistic last year and only 4 people applied with an aver gpa of around 3.4-3.5, i think. they admitted him and only him with a 3.2 gpa. lol</p>
<p>Guys... as someone who was in the same position last year .. my word of assurance for a few of you is that if you fall around the avg admit gpa from last year and have completed your pre-reqs.. you WILL be admitted..</p>
<p>I like that UCLA is really on the ball as far as statistics. It takes (me, at least) a lot more time to hunt around other schools' websites (I'm looking at you, UCSB) to find data that's not nearly as complete.</p>