<p>Hey... I'm applying for Fall 2007 at UCLA and wanted to know anyone's input, advice, and chances of getting in.</p>
<p>SAT: 2070
ACT: 30
SAT II: 670 and 700
Overall Weighted GPA: 4.425
Overall Unweighted: 3.925
State College Weighted: 4.5909
State College Unweighted: 3.8636
Top 2% in class, something like 4/230
Go to Foothill Technology High School in Ventura, CA -- top 20 in public school testing scores</p>
<p>Senior Year taking:
AP Biology
AP English Literature
AP Government
Honors Economics
Bioethics
Biotechnology Applications and Methods (part of a BioScience Academy at my school, like 30 students in my class are in it-- includes Bioethics)</p>
<p>AP English Language: 4
AP US History: 4
AP Calculus AB: 4
AP Calculus BC: 4
3 years of Spanish
Taken every Honors/AP course at school except for Spanish 4 AP and Physics AP because they didnt fit in my schedule with basketball</p>
<p>Will write strong essays for application</p>
<p>Volunteered at local hospital since I was a freshman... have aver 400 hours, and was invited to the Benefactor's Ball for accomplishments.</p>
<p>Basketball for 4 years
Football for 1 year</p>
<p>Nominated for and Attended National Youth Leadership Forum on Medicine (NYLF)</p>
<p>So what do you guys think? In or not? Thanks for the help!</p>
<p>thanks guys...... anyone else have anything to say on whether or not they believe I can get in, and anything I might need to improve on between now and the end of the year??</p>
<p>People are getting way too generous. Apply anyways, but don't count on getting in. 3.92 UC weighted and a 2070 is never a match for UCLA. If you were a 4.2-3 fully weighted and a 2100 or so. Then yeah. Match.</p>
<p>UCLA average is 4.25 uncapped and about 2000 for the SAT. The jump from 4.25 to 4.425 is quite big, and I say that he/she is in. courseload is good, ec's are decent, SAT subjects could use improvement, but overall, chances are easily above 90%.</p>
<p>Keep in mind that the "average" is usually the 75th - 25th percentile range of applicants. Without knowing the standard deviation of any of the criteria, it's impossible to really say for sure what the OP's actual chances are.</p>
<p>It's safer to go with broader language, and I'd say match or safe match are good ranges. Trust me, I've seen tons of kids with very similar stats get dinged. It's not worth saying "ZOMG! LOCK!" when it's just not possible.</p>