<p>Right. Nor should they take any advice (especially numerical data) without scepticism. My problem was with the agressive and slanderous critical language used against my work and my opinions. (Ex. “trying to sound smart on interweb”) though this statement alone is questionable and almost unreadable, it is still a crack at my motives for starting this thread in the first place. If I was trying to sound smart or wanting people believe my every word I would not have put disclaimer after disclaimer on every one of my posts with “take this with a grain of salt.” I accept the valid criticism but I resent the manner and language in which it was executed. An argument from the ethos, or authority, prespective was not my intention. However it was my opponents intention from the get go…I simply pointed out that he should use a more respected website than Wikipedia to argue from that prespective.</p>