UCLA sucks part 2

<p>um..yeah, ok.</p>

<p>ucla still sucks though...</p>

<p>Moss! I remember you. You transferred last year, right? USC now?</p>

<p><a href="http://www.consusgroup.com/news/rankings/colleges/colleges.asp%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.consusgroup.com/news/rankings/colleges/colleges.asp&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>How about a taste of your own medicine?</p>

<p>amherst...comparable to ucsd? haha we know thats a lie.</p>

<p>Like I said, vandy at 39? Dartmouth > MIT??</p>

<p>those were based on prestige. Its not my fault americans in the south, west and midwest think that.</p>

<p>if we don't take any rankings into consideration</p>

<p>ucla sucks even more</p>

<p>exactly!!!! ucla is still nothing</p>

<p>at least amherst is still reputable even without it.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0509.collegeguide.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0509.collegeguide.html&lt;/a>
<a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.national.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.national.html&lt;/a>
:rolleyes:</p>

<p>like i said, wellesley is better than ucla. Thanks for proving my point dhl.</p>

<p>You're welcome.
The same way Cornell and all other Ivies rank way behind UCLA.</p>

<p>dhl just found 2 links that says LA > Wellesley....how's that reading comp part of those LSAT's coming haha??</p>

<p>what are u talkng about? ucla was #5 on the rankings and wellesley was #1 in its field.</p>

<p>actually, both links say ucla < wellesley</p>

<p>someone needs to get their eyes checked :confused:</p>

<p>Haha, they have their seperate field...what's that tell u??</p>

<p>you say that i lack logic, but it seems its the other way around!</p>

<p>you cant compare liberal arts colleges with universities. Liberal art colleges dont have graduate schools, thats why they have separate rankings.</p>

<p>I'm sorry but has anyone posted up another ranking chart or something cuz as far as I'm concerned none of the links I posted has UCLA as #5....</p>

<p>you posted this link:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.national.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0609.national.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>oops, my bad, number 4, thats A LOT better. I guess now you truly beat wellesley!</p>

<p>Stop trying to make your crappy school look better, it still sucks.</p>

<p>
[quote]
you cant compare liberal arts colleges with universities.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Thank god you finally found the flaw in your own logic.</p>

<p>no graduate schools = no world renowned professors = no ability to work under the masters in their field. </p>

<p>Thread Closed.</p>

<p>you dont get it! if we are talking about UNDERGRADUATE degrees, LIBERAL ARTS COLLEGES ARE COMPARABLE, and im some cases, better.</p>

<p>nice to see you do some selective reading.</p>