UCLA transfer question

Transfer Students UC Transfers
1

<p>I need some advice. I want to transfer to UCLA, I prefer to transfer in the shortest amount of time possible(2 years, but I would not be upset with 3). Right now I have a 4.0. For my prerequisites I still need
Gen Chem 2
OChem series
Calc Series(currently in trig, calc 1 during the fall)
Physics series
Bio Series</p>

<p>What I'm thinking is taking Gen chem 2 in the summer, so I can finish up the OChem series up in my second year. So after 2 years I would still need</p>

<p>Calc 3
some of the physics series.</p>

<p>Would that be smart? Or would that be way too difficult(taking gen chem 2 in the summer) and would it be smarter to just finish ALL of my prerequisites after 3 years?</p>

<p>Please give me your advice. (PS I am a bio major planning on becoming a dentist) (PS PS: I find gen chem 1 difficult but I gave up my social life and I am holding a high B with a good chance at an A)</p>

2

<p>Actually with either decision you will probably graduate in about the same amount of time:</p>

<p>If you transfer in 2 years then you will be missing some lower division classes. The question is do you prefer:</p>

<p>2 years @ CC + 3 years @ UCLA vs. 3 years @ CC + 2 @ UCLA.</p>

<p>The are pros and cons to both choices… it comes down to where do you want to spend that 3rd year.</p>

<p>However even with a high GPA, having some pre-reqs missing could make UCLA twice about admitting you.</p>