UCLA vs Cal Pre Med

I’m really conflicted right now between Berkeley and UCLA. I recently visited both campuses and to be honest I can’t decide because I liked both their vibes. For pre med, it seems like a lot of people across different forums said that UCLA is better because you can get a higher GPA and better opportunities at the hospital on campus, but when you look at the med school acceptance rates, it looks like it’s about 50%-55% for both schools. I mean, it’s practically the same. Can anyone explain this? Is there really an advantage in coming to UCLA or does it actually not matter at all?

By the way this is where I’m getting the numbers from:
https://career.berkeley.edu/MedStats/MedStats
http://www.career.ucla.edu/Students/Resources-Reports-and-Media/Med-School-Stats

I wouldn’t rely too much on Cal’s statistics. Not all premed students report them (supposedly, someone correct me if I’m wrong). UCLA is clearly the better choice in terms of premed opportunities (closer hospital, more volunteer opportunities) and grade-wise (grade deflation isn’t as bad).

Yes. Don’t believe everything you read. Especially in online forums.

I’m facing the same decision right now, and am slightly leaning towards UCLA because its grade deflation isn’t as bad and its campus and westwood is nicer, however, Cal has higher prestige, so I’m still not sure

The prestige between Cal and UCLA is very, very small – and in the workforce it’s unlikely that having gone to Cal vs. UCLA will give you any leverage. Furthermore, the tiny edge that Cal might have certainly will not outweigh the negative effects of a lower gpa or less experience.

For UCLA to be less cutthroat competitive in the pre-med than any other school is unimaginable to me!