<p>dyip, your so off topic its pathetic. </p>
<p>but ill entertain your stupidity.
ok first of all, im sure you prbably realize by now that the TRojan Family works. and that LA big biz is saturated by Trojans. now you say living alums are not important b/c my future boss will most likely not be Trojan, like this is somehow relevant. tell me genius, if USC consistently sends its recent alums to all over socal, dont you think these alums would eventually move up in an organization. therefore, making it more likely my future boss will be a Trojan? common sense? yet of course, whether or not my future boss will be an SC alum is completely irrelevant so lets just put that stupidity behind us.</p>
<p>"I am saying that your claim that the USC alumni will help you in the long run is bogus."</p>
<p>uhh the 'long run' was never really my point of argument. </p>
<p>"UCLA's living alumni is of little importance? Well if there are 3x more Bruins than Trojans, and (a generation ago) Bruins were better than Trojans, then isn't it more likely you will encounter a UCLA boss?"</p>
<p>ok, is the stat that there are 3x more bruins something you pulled from your arse or what. ucla has 40,000 students total. USC has 30,000. including undergrad and grad. cula has 25000 undergrad, while USC has 15,000. exactly how would ucla send 3x more poeple to the world if it oonly has 10,000 more students? </p>
<p>and another thing, if you cruise the streest of LA (even west LA) and OC, you will probably notice the alumni liscence plate ring on that porsche, bmw, or benz that cut your toyota off. at uci, i probably saw thre a week. dont get me strated on the USC alums that live on my sisters stereet in irvine. while thats something you could say im fabricating, thats ok. i can respect that i cant really prove something like that. just pay attention to those alumni liscence plate rings. especially pay attention to the car.</p>
<p>"For the Trojans out there, get over it. UCLA is ranked higher than USC. You are going to USC for two reasons.
1)The more common reason is that you could not get into a top 25 school so accept the fact that you're going to a nontop 25 school. USC is still a good school stop your whining.
2) The second reason is because you are going to USC for reasons that are not US News ranking. In that case, stop trying to argue that USC is a top 25 school if you never cared about rankings in the first place."</p>
<p>this was never a point of discussion, way to stay on topic. </p>
<p>"Hey, if a person decides not to go to UCLA to go to UCI because UCI offered more money does it make UCI a better school?"</p>
<p>your thoughts are all over the place in that post. no uci is not a better school if its cheaper. but dont you find it ineresting that its cheaper ofr some students to go to USC than a public. that just weakens the "money argument". i never stated that USC was better b/c its cheaper for me. </p>
<p>"on average, are smarter than USC graduates in the business world."</p>
<p>let me tell how absolutely inept it is to make an argument that ucla alums are more succesful than USC alums b/c of wharton school placement. listen, tere are rougly less than on quarter biz majors who are in biz grad school. you wanna know why its not more like 3/4s. b/c undergrad biz major already know that isc. finanice in undergrad is the same in grad. accounting in undergad is that same as grad. so is marketing, ob, so on and so forth. how do i know this? my cousin went ucla's anderson school, im well aware of their curriciclum. they even use some of the same boooks. my uncle went uchicago gsb, he concurs. a gradute biz program is a truncated undergrad biz program without the the GEs. tell me smart guy, why would i pay to go back to school to learn ish i already know when and paying through the nose for it when i could be in the field advancing my career and making more money. theres a reason why biz majors dont go back to school. and theres a reason why mba admissions are decreasing steadily. so its normal for a school like ucla with no biz program to send more non biz studenmts to b school. where as USC alreadfy has a biz major so most students. dont need to go back to school. that link with that list of upenn mba breakdown, only 5 schools on that list out of 20 have an undergad biz program. </p>
<p>"Before you tell me USC is very strong along the Pacific Rim for business, visit Hong Kong, Mainland China, Taiwan, and Japan. I think your trip will tell you otherwise."</p>
<p>you have no clue, so dont speak on this. yes, USC does have connections to the pacific rim.</p>
<p>"However, in my posts I intend to refute MrTrojanMan and his claims that USC is better in the business world."</p>
<p>keep up the good job.</p>
<p>"As a matter of fact, I'm planning on majoring in biz econ...UCLA graduates get jobs just as good if not better. "</p>
<p>so your not even majoring in biz econ right now. but youre already an expert of the biz world.</p>
<p>"Do you really think graduating from USC will land you a six figure salary right off the bat?"</p>
<p>that, again, was never a point of discussion.</p>