<p>I was wondering whether anyone knows whether doing ucla's scholar program would be better for applying to grad schools or whether doing a regular undergrad pattern at another school would be better.</p>
<p>Any insight would be appreciated.</p>
<p>I’m still on the edge for this program, but probably not going to do it because of double majoring applied math/physics. I don’t think this program is really worth it because the result is an M.A., which is only good if you want to go into teaching. Might want to go to a PhD. program, in which case the school may require you to take a GRE anyways.</p>
<p>Would doing the program put me at any advantage for applying to phd programs?</p>
<p>I think having a Masters from the program is a plus since you’re still seen as coming straight from an undergrad (but with bonus points) in the eyes of an admissions committee. The biggest things though for getting into a top grad school are good GPA and excellent LETTERS of REC. from leaders in the field. It worked for me. I had virtually no background, but thanks to an excellent rec. from a prof., I got into a top ten school. Start building your “teacher-student” rel. early.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>Two major benefits of the Scholar’s Program are 1. You are required to pass the Basic Exam, and 2. You get to take grad courses.</p>
<p>If you decide to get a PhD in Mathematics you will have to pass exams in Analysis, Algebra, Topology, etc (the exact # and subjects depends on the school) Passing the Basic will be a positive indicator that you will be capable to pass those grueling exams. Furthermore, by taking grad courses, you are demonstrating to adcoms that you are ready for PhD-level coursework.</p>
<p>As was mentioned before, make sure you get solid reqs that discuss your research potential.</p>