<p>Re, engineering:</p>
<p>The technology officers at Microsoft and Cisco were at one time at least UCLA grads. The latter is a woman…</p>
<p>There are some prominent chip makers representing UCLA.</p>
<p>I think your ranking of USC > UCLA is based mainly on grad rankings. And I wouldnt put Cal >>>> than either UCLA or USC.</p>
<p>I would say generally by recruiters in SoCal, and undergrads UCLA > USC</p>
<p>Re, Law:</p>
<p>Heres the [url=<a href=“http://members.calbar.ca.gov/search/demographics.aspx]link[/url”>Attorney Demographics]link[/url</a>] to the CA Bar-certified attys. Page down down about 1/2. Admittedly, theres a relatively thin margin between Cal and UCLA. Even though oos isnt represented, I would imagine there would be decent NYC representation by UCLA (as well as Cal). Grads whove attended Cornell, NYU, Columbia Law who were recruited by NYC firms.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>So true, UCLA grads are stuck at Southwestern and Cal grads attend Yale, etc. </p>
<p>Actually, both UCLA and Cal are doubtlessly represented well at top law centers - large universities, many grads pointing towards law. HLS when they still showed the undergrad representation a few years ago listed UCLA and Cal as ~ even, and two of the top public u feeders. Im sure they stopped linking this list because people were using the site against other us.</p>
<p>Entertainment:</p>
<p>Generally…</p>
<p>USC> UCLA>>> Cal.</p>
<p>Depends on what facet of the field:</p>
<p>Entertainment Law:</p>
<p>UCLA> USC> Cal</p>
<p>Production, Directing:</p>
<p>USC>UCLA>>>Cal</p>
<p>Writing/Screenplays:</p>
<p>UCLA possibly > USC >>> Cal (one cant teach creativity even with the best film program)</p>
<p>Theatre/Drama/Acting:
USC ~ = UCLA >>> Cal</p>