<p>
NYU actually belongs in Tier 1; I just overlooked it and forgot to include it in that list I provided. Past rankings of Economics programs suggest that CMU should be ranked a tad bit higher but it’s very possible that Wash U and Brown have improved vis-a-vis Carnegie Mellon in the past 15 years and you need to acknowledge the possibility of this.</p>
<p>
Well, I don’t know what to say; the most prominent research-based ranking system of graduate programs in the country disagrees with you. Although you seem very well informed; I think I will trust the judgment of the experts in this case.</p>
<p>
One good thing about the NRC rating system is that it provides both a Survey based regression ordering and a Reputation based regression ordering. The former deals with what leading economics faculty members consider to be the most important factors that determine a program’s strength and the latter deals with what features in renowned departments (like Harvard or Chicago) that economist admire and see duplicated in other programs.</p>
<p>So essentially, the S-Ranking deals with what economists deem to be important when assessing economics programs while the R-Ranking is concerned with what these economists actually seem to value subconsciously when rating economics departments and comparing them to the ones they respect the most.</p>
<p>For example, when asked what factor is most important in selecting a food item at a grocery store, someone might answer “nutritional value” and this is what the S-Ranking measures; however, when the judge assesses what this individual actually bought from the grocery store after considering a variety of options, he finds that the person actually values “low prices” more which is what the R-Ranking tries to capture. It is the difference between what something “ought to be” and what something “actually is” when tested in a real-life scenario.</p>
<p>When looking at both the S-Ranking and the R-Ranking together, you basically have the most powerful tool for assessing academic departments.</p>
<p>Maryland’s S-Ranking: (18-30), R-Ranking: (5-18)
Wash U’s S-Ranking: (17-27), R-Ranking: (17-26)
Brown’s S-Ranking: (12-20), R-Ranking: (14-24)</p>
<p>Even the S-Ranking puts Wash U and Brown solidly in Tier 3 while the S-Ranking puts Maryland in Tier 3 instead of Tier 2 like the R-Ranking so there may be some variation there.</p>
<p>You just have to admit it; Brown, Wash U and Maryland have elite economics departments now and the latter’s might be super-elite like Wisconsin’s.</p>