<p>The financial state of Berkeley is overstated. Basically, the UCs as a whole are desperately trying to get funding reinstated, and so all of them, including Berkeley, will caterwaul about the effects on the universities long-term, in order to scare both lawmakers and voters. It’s true that the system is being greatly affected, and funding does need to be reinstated. But Berkeley in particular is doing just fine - its operating budget is the same as it was before the cuts ($1.8 billion), it has a good sized endowment that they finally set up a separate company to manage, its huge alumni network has stepped up and donated, and its faculty are still winning big awards. The other UCs, except UCLA, have a lot more to worry about.</p>
<p>To be honest, these budget cuts are exactly what Berkeley needs - it’s been edging toward becoming “more private” for a long time, similar to UVA, and the budget cuts allow it to tell the state, “fine, we’re accepting more out-of-state students.” As a result, Berkeley’s median SAT has jumped quite high, about 2100 now. Consider the top private schools weren’t far ahead of that just 2-3 years ago.</p>
<p>Ann Arbor is a great college town, but it’s wrong to say that Berkeley isn’t. Some like to say that Davis, CA is the best college town because it revolves completely around UC Davis. But that’s not a good definition of a college town - it not only needs a strong presence of a college, but it needs to offer students tons of things to do. In that respect, Berkeley is hard to beat - it’s very culturally diverse, and you know that no matter the time of the year, you’ll be able to do things in Berkeley, because the weather is nearly always decent (though it does get chilly/rainy). Ann Arbor, on the other hand, will have quite a bit of snow. Since you’re from Canada, I think you might appreciate the Bay Area more. On that note, the Bay Area is infinitely more interesting than the Detroit-Ann Arbor-Flint area. You have easy access to the bay, to Oakland, to the ocean, to wine country, to various mountains. Not to mention Yosemite and Lake Tahoe are a drive away. Then there’s San Francisco, which puts Detroit to shame. SF is one of the most diverse places in the country, and it’s a short BART ride away from Berkeley. </p>
<p>If you’re interested in working in the tech industry, this is a no-brainer. Silicon Valley is nearby, and SF itself also has lots of tech companies (most recently Twitter). If you want to work in the auto industry, then it’s also a no-brainer - Michigan.</p>
<p>Both are great in EE, though the edge would go to Berkeley, which is perennially ranked in the top 3 for EE (with Stanford and MIT).</p>
<p>If national prestige is your concern, see this:</p>
<p>[Harvard</a> Number One University in Eyes of Public](<a href=“Harvard Number One University in Eyes of Public”>Harvard Number One University in Eyes of Public)</p>
<p>Berkeley and Michigan are comparable in national prestige, with Berkeley tied with ND and Princeton. Internationally, the two aren’t so comparable:</p>
<p>[Top</a> Universities by Reputation 2012](<a href=“http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2011-2012/reputation-rankings.html]Top”>World Reputation Rankings 2012 | Times Higher Education (THE))</p>
<p>EECS is one of the few disciplines for which, if you got into Stanford or MIT, it wouldn’t be so crazy to go to Berkeley, as it would for most other fields (you’d still be a little crazy, but not as crazy). That’s how good it is. And while both Michigan and Berkeley are at the top in a wide variety of fields, Berkeley definitely wins in breadth+depth of study, so you know that no matter what you change your major to, you’re going to be in a top-10 department with top faculty.</p>