<p>
This so-called “Huazhong ranking” is an EXACT COPY of USNWR’s 2004 ranking. Btw, if you click on any one of the schools, it will bring you to the USNWR site for that school.</p>
<p>Huazhong never claims to rank US universities. It merely provides an information link for the top 100 US universities (according to USNWR in 2004), just as the link it provides to the “Top 100 British Universities in 2003” by Financial Times ([::Links::](<a href=“http://www.hust.edu.cn/english/link/oversea/default.htm]::Links::[/url]”>http://www.hust.edu.cn/english/link/oversea/default.htm)</a>).</p>
<p>ring, you’ve been had. Your family friend didn’t know diddly about university rankings. The “QS World University Rankings” is clearly an OVERALL ranking instead of purely undergraduate education as you claimed. Look at the methodology:</p>
<p>1) 20% is on “Citations per faculty”
2) postgraduate students are included in the “FTE students” count and “international factors”
3) The survey for “Academic peer review” (40% weight) asks each reviewer to pick the top research programs in each category:
<a href=“http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/methodology/peer_review/[/url]”>http://www.topuniversities.com/worlduniversityrankings/methodology/peer_review/</a> … see "click here to preview Academic Peer Review Survey) … and here’s one of the questions (<a href=“http://research.qsnetwork.com/qs_surveysystem/index.php?viewonly&order=normal&partnerset=0&survey=52&jump_to_section=9):%5B/url%5D”>http://research.qsnetwork.com/qs_surveysystem/index.php?viewonly&order=normal&partnerset=0&survey=52&jump_to_section=9):</a></p>
<p>“Natural Sciences
Please select up to thirty universities you regard as producing the best research in the NATURAL SCIENCES subject area”</p>
<p>and these are the only questions in the survey.</p>