university of minnesota-twin cities is the most underrated school

<p>I think that is pretty accurate although there is still a small gap but UMinn has many excellent areas. They are considering downsizing the school and getting rid of the open enrollment college.</p>

<p>Nationally it doesn't have a bad rep, its peer assessment rating was 3.7 and that would put it like 40 overall. That is what I think it should be about. It is a great school and that 74 is BS. I think it is just another underrated public university. The peer assessment ranking(there was a post where someone did the whole thing) is a good ranking of prestige and it doesn't penalize publics. IU is underrated also and so is University of Arizona. Purdue is ranked low as is Maryland and Texas. Texas really should be about 20 spots up. UMD about 15, Purdue about 15-20, Minnisota should be about 35 up, IU should be aout 30. minnisota is disgustingly underrated in the rankings.</p>

<p>Why is that? Is there a specific stat that pulls it down in US news? It has top 20 engineering and business programs and I have always thought of it as a good school.</p>

<p>It shouldnt get **** if you cannot even spell the state's name correctly.....</p>

<p>^^ lol, i think I shouldn't get **** because i am dumb enough not to spell it correctly.</p>

<p>US NEWS PEER ASSESSMENT RATINGS (2004?)</p>

<p>1 Princeton University (NJ) 4.9
1 Harvard University (MA) 4.9
1 Massachusetts Inst. of Technology 4.9
1 Stanford University (CA) 4.9
5 Yale University (CT) 4.8
6 California Institute of Technology 4.7
6 University of Chicago 4.7
6 University of California – Berkeley * 4.7
9 Columbia University (NY) 4.6
9 Cornell University (NY) 4.6
9 Johns Hopkins University (MD) 4.6
9 University of Michigan – Ann Arbor * 4.6
13 Duke University (NC) 4.5
13 University of Pennsylvania 4.5
15 Dartmouth College (NH) 4.4
15 Northwestern University (IL) 4.4
15 Brown University (RI) 4.4
15 University of Virginia * 4.4
19 Univ. of California – Los Angeles * 4.3
19 Univ. of Wisconsin – Madison * 4.3
21 Washington University in St. Louis 4.2
21 Rice University (TX) 4.2
21 Carnegie Mellon University (PA) 4.2
21 U. of North Carolina – Chapel Hill * 4.2
25 Emory University (GA) 4.1
25 Vanderbilt University (TN) 4.1
25 Georgia Institute of Technology * 4.1
25 U. of Illinois – Urbana - Champaign * 4.1
25 University of Texas – Austin * 4.1
30 Georgetown University (DC) 4
30 University of Washington * 4
32 University of Notre Dame (IN) 3.9
32 Univ. of California – San Diego * 3.9
32 Pennsylvania State U. – University Park * 3.9
35 Univ. of Southern California 3.8
35 College of William and Mary (VA)* 3.8
35 New York University 3.8
35 University of California – Davis * 3.8
35 Purdue Univ. – West Lafayette (IN)* 3.8
35 Univ. of Minnesota – Twin Cities * 3.8
35 Indiana University – Bloomington * 3.8</p>

<p>Accepted Already did it for the 2005 year in this thread <a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=152068&highlight=PEER+ASSESSMENT%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=152068&highlight=PEER+ASSESSMENT&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>


</p></li>
</ol>

<p>Sorry to revive this from the dead, but which college of theirs is open enrollment? I’m guessing the St. Paul campus(CFANS?), but I may be mistaken. I’m starting at the U for Economics(College of Liberal Arts) and start this tues.</p>

<p>Also, when you are saying mega-campus liabilities, do you mean it is easy to get lost academically since you don’t get the attention from staff/faculty that you should get? I have heard the larger campuses you are treated as though you are a number, not as a person.</p>

<p>I would say that all the state flagship universities you mentioned are roughly equal.</p>

<p>Obviously, if you are not rich, even a brilliant kid might wind up at the flagship state university, and then, when the kids from the colleges you mentioned (Georgia, Maryland, etc) then apply to graduate school, with let’s say, a B+ average in the same major, I think they will be considered roughly equal. I don’t think that the Georgia kid or the Maryland kid will be considered “better” than the Minnesota kid. However, I would say Berkeley, UCLA, Michigan, Virginia, and UNC would be considered “better”.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>You’re mistaken. The University of Minnesota currently has no open enrollment colleges. It had a General College for about 70 years, but it closed around 2006 or 2007 in a money-saving move, but also in an effort by the administration to raise Minnesota’s academic standards and graduation rate. It was a controversial move, however. The General College was about 50% students of color, most of them from economically and academically disadvantaged backgrounds. Its supporters pointed to the many success stories of students who were given a chance by the General College and moved on to academic and professional success. The university administration pointed to high costs, low graduation rates, and dilution in quality of the student body. It’s a tough call. What should the mission of a public flagship be—especially an urban pubic flagship?</p>

<p>[MPR:</a> U of M and diversity linked in debate over General College](<a href=“http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/04/12_helmsm_students/]MPR:”>MPR: U of M and diversity linked in debate over General College)</p>

<p>The General College aside, Minnesota IS underrated. Its undergrad engineering and business schools are among the top 25 in the nation. It’s got outstanding faculties in econ, poli sci, psychology, and the biological sciences. Best of all, it’s cheap for OOS students, who pay $4K above in-state tuition. That makes total COA at Minnesota lower for a California resident than UC Berkeley or UCLA…</p>