<p>I have used barrons and pr. Which practice test is more accurate? and also, pr 's curve is pretty harsh( two or fewer wrong for 800) , is that so on the real test?</p>
<p>can someone help me please?</p>
<p>I think on the real test it's like 2 or 3 wrong.</p>
<p>PR's way more accurate than barrons.</p>
<p>anyone else has any idea?</p>
<p>Princeton Review is VERY accurate!! I took the SATII Biology twice (May 2007 and June 2007). In both tests I saw questions almost identical to those on PR. I got a 700-730 range on PR and on the real test- 650 first time, 720 second time.</p>
<p>is the newest PR book(2007-2008) different from the older ones( in practice test)?</p>
<p>I don't think there should be much difference, since the test hasn't changed. Princeton Review is pretty accurate, and I think the curve is accurate, harsh though it may sound. I seem to remember seeing a similar curve in SparkNotes... you have to miss less than 2 (or was it 3? I think 2) to get an 800.</p>
<p>i did ok on pr practice test..but i dunno if the real test s gonna be like dat</p>
<p>Princeton Review's practice tests are pretty similar to the questions on the SAT II.</p>