<p>Which SATII is slightly easier to study for?
Which test is easier(if there's even a difference)?</p>
<p>us history fo sho'</p>
<p>Although, I've only taken World History, I am going to take USH. I would have to say world history because its a much broader subject and you still need to know obscure facts. All though, I would have to say the difference is slight.</p>
<p>Having taken both, I must say the World one was easier. The US one asked many obscure facts, while the world questions tended to be a lot more general. I really blew off studying for world too... im sure if you spend a good month studying from the barrons book for world u should be fine.</p>
<p>I don't know about US history, but in the case of World history all you need in order to get high scores is to read 300 pages once.</p>
<p>mmm.. I think U.S history.... world history covers too much.. even though w.h is more general u still need to know lots of facts!.. so confusing for me!!..</p>
<p>I think World is easier. Like the other posters said, it's a lot broader so the questions tend to be much more general. On the USH test, it's pretty much memorization of obscure facts that will help you get a higher score. This could be just me, though... I find world history to be much more interesting than USH (no offence to anyone).</p>