<p>lol could anyone send me a copy when released :D</p>
<p>USC is basically the new WashU. The school is doing all it can to increase it rankings on US News by playing to their metrics. It is impressive how USC acceptance rate has fallen in the past years, but its funny how I and many of my friends received whole applications in the mail from USC when none of us had shown the slightest interest in the school. I didn't even have to pay postage. What's even stranger was the fact that I wasn't even from the West Coast but live all the way in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. It was just somewhat random and looks in a way USC is just trying to increase its applicants to artificially lower its acceptance rate. Either way USC really doesn't have that great of an academic rep where I am from. The most idiotic people in my class would say their going to go to USC or UF. Granted USC has done a great job in improving itself......it is no Berkeley</p>
<p>I think it will go like this.</p>
<ol>
<li>Harvard</li>
<li>Princeton</li>
<li>Yale</li>
<li>MIT</li>
<li>Stanford</li>
<li>CIT</li>
<li>Penn</li>
<li>Columbia</li>
<li>Duke</li>
<li>Chicago</li>
</ol>
<p>Am I close to right?</p>
<p>On USC, they cheat at football too.</p>
<p>/Oregon(andStanford)bias</p>
<p>The 2009 rankings as you may already know can be accessed
here. </p>
<p>It is particularly interesting that a separate category
"Economic diversity amongst top schools" had to be created
(compare it to "Economic Diversity") to begin seeing the top schools
in the top 10 again.</p>