<p>Hey, so ive been trying to decide between USC and UCLA, here what I have so far:
btw, im planing to major in business and international relations
USC:
Pros:
- campus/ community feel
- arguably smaller class sizes
- trojan networking
- business school
Cons:
-location?
- lack of diversity (in terms of socio-economic status) </p>
<p>UCLA:
Pros:
- Location
- better international reputation?
Cons:
- Size
- Trouble getting classes </p>
<p>Can anyone help add to this list? or refute/ support any of my points?</p>
<p>Thankss</p>
<p>USC having a lack of socio-economic diversity is an outdated stereotype. The median household income of UCLA students is actually higher than that of USC students and has been for some time… Also I think by ‘arguably smaller class sizes’ you mean ‘actually smaller class sizes.’</p>
<p>There are many usc vs. ucla threads you can search for on these forums. This topic has been hashed out many times. However, if you want to study business for undergrad then you you will probably come to USC (as I did in the same situation) since UCLA does not have a business undergraduate major.</p>
<p>Also the concern about lack of socio-economic diversity is definitely not true. I assume that comes from usc’s past stereotype.</p>