<p>I know, another one of those comparison threads! But I really am lost right now, and with less than a week left to decide where I'm going I was hoping I could get some good advice (alums??) on here.</p>
<p>I can either attend USC or Virginia Tech. I plan on going to medical school after college and as a career I want to get involved in research pertaining to global health and disease. I have visited both campuses, done extensive research, and talked to countless people about this, and hands down I like USC better. This is not a question of which school is "right" for me; this is a question of MONEY. </p>
<p>USC would cost me $53,000/year to attend, whereas Virginia Tech would cost me $25,000/year to attend. That does not include plane flights to and from LA. My parents have told me that if I go to USC, they will ensure that I come out of my undergraduate education debt-free. However, if I go to Virginia Tech, I would come out debt-free and they would also pay for half of my medical school tuition. I am not 100% positive I am going to medical school, but regardless I would need to get a PhD so I will be going to graduate school. There are other ways to finance this through scholarships etc., but I can't take that as a given obviously. </p>
<p>So now for why I like USC. USC has programs called Global Health and Health Promotion/Disease Prevention that fit my interests perfectly. I love LA, I have relatives in California, I love the campus, love the people, the atmosphere, and the opportunities I would have as an undergrad at USC in the way of research and intellectual stimulation in my classes. I love that USC is a large university that still manages to maintain the small student/faculty ratio and interaction. I was also accepted into Freshman Science Honors, so my class size in the sciences freshman year would be even smaller. Looking at the course catalog at USC, there are SO many classes I would be thrilled to take. I also just love the excitement of California; I am from CT, so it would be a huge change in a big city, which is what I want. There would also be more chances for me to volunteer/get involved in internships at USC. Also, with the Keck School of Medicine right there, I would have numerous chances for interaction with med students/research.</p>
<p>Virginia Tech, on the other hand, would be fine. Not great, but fine. The classes would be large, little student/faculty interaction, I'm not crazy about the location (I want a city!), it's not as prestigious of a school, and the campus just didn't have the same feel for me. I was accepted into University Honors, so that would help a little as far as class sizes go, but I have heard that it is difficult to get into honors classes because of the sheer number of students. Essentially, Virginia Tech is a practical choice. I am sure I would get by there just fine, but my heart tells me that I don't want "just fine". I want extraordinary, and the mental stimulation to explore. I have also looked at the course catalog, and while the courses are good solid basics, they aren't quite as interesting to me as the variety presented by USC. Tech does have a rising med school, but while at USC I KNOW I could get involved, I'm not so sure at Tech that I could. </p>
<p>So, alumni or even just adults in general, what would you do? Is the experience of USC worth the money, or would it be stupid of me to go there when I could get a perfectly acceptable education at Tech for a lot less? Oh, and just to clarify, this is not a question of "where will I stand a better chance of getting into med school". I am sure I will succeed no matter where I go, so I will get good grades regardless, and I know that the prestige of undergrad school is not a huge factor in med school acceptance.</p>