<p>I'm planning on using Rocket Review and Gruber's this summer for prep. The only area of overlap that I will have is over the math section (I'm not using Gruber's for CR or W). I want to avoid conflicting advice and not stress out over a billion different tips from two sources. Should I just stick to Gruber's review section and practice problems (and ignore the strategies section)?</p>
<p>Wow, you don’t want to stress over a billion different tips from multiple sources so you post a question on an Internet forum? </p>
<p>Why don’t you just do as much as you can from whatever resources you have and pick the strategies and tips that work best for you during practice tests or that seem easiest for you to implement?</p>
<p>For CR especially, you will have to experiment a little to see what approach works best for you. However, most strategies are the same for all prep books, so don’t worry too much. </p>
<p>When reviewing material, don’t waste your time reading prep books. Just do problems in the BB until you get to one you don’t know. Then go to your handy prep book to find the right classification to figure out the solution.</p>
<p>read Xiggi’s advice: [url=<a href=“The Kellonathan :: 人生環状線 - 空回り : 네이버 블로그”>The Kellonathan :: 人生環状線 - 空回り : 네이버 블로그]The</a> Kellonathan :: </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>There are 60+ pages of math strategy in Grubers and 100+ in RR. There are three responses in this thread.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’ve thought about doing this. It’s just that I don’t want to do a bunch of problems and ingrain bad test taking habits, only to find out later.</p>
<p>You can study strategies and content separately, you know. Read up on the strategy sections in your prep books first, and pick the ones that you like. Then apply those strategies as you review. I seriously think it’s easier to do than to explain.</p>