<p>D is heavily into it, as I know somemom's kid is. My kid's profile/make-up/history is that she will attempt , with some success, to over-power the dang thing. From my reading, this doesn't concern me the same way her MCAT prep did, as this does seem to be a more "cumulative knowledge" test requiring substantial review and maybe less test strategy. In fact, it might well play to some of her strengths. Hoping a pro can comment. </p>
<p>D ended classes a while back. Maybe a month ago. The day after classes ended she had some sort of "practical test". The day after that, her class, as a whole, took a "Shelf Exam"- a 4 hour test that supposedly bore a direct resemblance to the 7 hour Step 1 and , I guess, was intended to be "diagnostic". She scored over what she needed to "pass" the test, but maybe 10 points over which is 40 points under where she wants to be for her residency apps. Not bad, I think, before starting her review.</p>
<p>Last weekend (edit: weekend before last) , she took a full-length test after making it through about half of her review. She improved almost 30 points. (And found some holes in already reviewed material but basically her improvement tracked her study topics. But some results were random and un-explainable) Again. Not bad, I think. </p>
<p>Still has 21 days left before the test. Her plan is to finish her in-depth review (or re-learn ;)) within the next ten days. At the same time, she is going back and dealing with each topic in a mini-review to keep it fresh. And then take another diagnostic exam. Hopefully that exam will produce a score close to what she feels she needs. </p>
<p>She's voicing that she is not trying to kill the test, just do well enough to get to what she feels will be her strongest residency app points (rec's, eval's, etc). IOW, not have a score low enough to be culled before a full review of her app. </p>
<p>Others students at her school and from her UG have a substantially different schedule ( a moderate review, repeated over and over), but she believes her strategy is better for her and she's gonna go with her gut. </p>
<p>My fear as a parent of this particular kid comes from: </p>
<p>a) complete ignorance about the test</p>
<p>b) dis-belief about her study schedule (8-12-15 hours a day, everyday except 1 so far) </p>
<p>c) A history of ignoring strategy and relying on intellectual muscle and work to power through any obstacle</p>
<p>d) A couple of times where she over-did it in high school, over-tried is the most acurate term. Once or twice in high profile athletic competitions where she tried to do too much and once in an academic competition where prior successes led her to "over-try" . Those 3 events are burned into my parental brain. They were ugly. Of course, there were many more events where she performed pretty much flawlessly. Looking back, it's when she demanded and expected a near flawless performance and the event was "high profile" that the problems came in. She does not fear tests and is an excellent test-taker. Confident of her preparation and intellect. She does the work. But these outliers bug me. </p>
<p>So....I have been coaching "realistic expectations". "Balanced life" even while studying. And she is at least listening. She is the type that needs to be calmed down in intensity, not ramped up. (Something her high school coach failed to grasp. lol)</p>
<p>So. Any word from the pros on her approach to the test and my approach to her? If not, hey. I needed to vent something out my stress-pipe, so at least I feel better for typing this. ;) lol</p>