<p>The publication of the 2009 USNWR College Rankings provides an opportunity to compare schools based on a wide variety of data points. In this and in other threads, I urge the reader to think less about the absolute rankings and more about the nature and value-added of the data point being discussed.</p>
<li>Harvard 4.9</li>
<li>Stanford 4.9</li>
<li>MIT 4.9</li>
<li>Princeton 4.8</li>
<li>Yale 4.8</li>
<li>Berkeley 4.7</li>
<li>Caltech 4.6</li>
<li>Chicago 4.6</li>
<li>Cornell 4.5</li>
<li>Columbia 4.5</li>
<li>Johns Hopkins 4.5</li>
<li>Penn 4.5</li>
<li>Duke 4.4</li>
<li>Michigan 4.4</li>
<li>Brown 4.3</li>
<li>Dartmouth 4.3</li>
<li>Northwestern 4.3</li>
<li>Virginia 4.3</li>
<li>UCLA 4.2</li>
<li>WUSTL 4.1</li>
<li>Carnegie Mellon 4.1</li>
<li>U North Carolina 4.1</li>
<li>Wisconsin 4.1</li>
<li>Rice 4.0</li>
<li>Georgetown 4.0</li>
<li>Georgia Tech 4.0</li>
<li>Illinois 4.0</li>
<li>Texas 4.0</li>
<li>Vanderbilt 4.0</li>
<li>Emory 3.9</li>
<li>Notre Dame 3.9</li>
<li>USC: 3.9</li>
<li>Washington: 3.9</li>
</ol>
<p>^courtesy of UCBChemEGrad</p>