<p>Forbes rankings are so utterly nonsensical. Georgia Tech at 500. Sarah Lawrence at 25. Come on!</p>
<p>Everyone (including the “author” of those rankings) is entitled to their own personal opinion and bias. I certainly have mine. But to suggest they are “objective rankings” is baloney.</p>
<p>While the schools can “game” the system by encouraging more and more applications, and some do…from kids who will never be admitted (cough…WashU)…the very fact that schools get HUGE numbers of applicants in comparison to the size of the student body and the freshmen class is an indication of the DESIRABILITY of attending that school. If it was THAT bad, they would not get those applications. True, some schools get beseiged with “safety school applications” and that inflates those numbers. </p>
<p>Look, if someone wants to go to Grinnell, Kenyon, Oberlin, Bradley, Creighton or Kansas State …then go for it. If that is what makes you happy, then do it. Prestige rankings should have little to do with your decision. </p>
<p>Going to a “better school” doesnt make you a “better person.” Period. Being a “better person” has to do with character and work ethic, not superficial rankings. </p>
<p>No more than driving a BMW makes you a better or more successful person. </p>
<p>The measure of success is whether you picked a good school for you, you survived and thrived, and you came out at graduation a more mature person, with a broader perspective on life, perhaps some expertise in a field of study, and hopefully some concern for your fellow man and strong desire to become a tax paying citizen who wants to get down to work. That could be Ohio State, Michigan, Stanford, Harvard, Princeton, Wofford, Temple, Pepperdine. Name a school. </p>
<p>Character and work ethic. No school “owns” those qualities.</p>
 In your dreams…I’d so want to go to your med school though. drooly face.</p>
 In your dreams…I’d so want to go to your med school though. drooly face.</p>