<p>Since I’m up early, I’ll give it a crack. I’ve only taken a single course (a semester of matlab) there, but I’ll give it a shot based on observations I make and what you can find on the internet to do an objective comparison.<br>
- In general false, but this general practice is common at all elite schools (for STEM classes)
- Super false, tons of events, thriving Greeklife, awesome student center, sports scene, concerts, etc.
- Doesn’t this tie into 1) and what other places. Compared to many elite STEM programs with engineering, likely not (probably about the same or easier than UT, Michigan, Berkeley, Chapel Hill, etc. Many elite schools have more rigorous natural science programs, whereas the engineering/technology and engineering/tech associated courses and depts tend to be really tough, just as chemistry and basic biology courses are unusually tough at elites with lots of pre-healths), since it’s mostly engineering, it just seems more stressful than these places overall. You don’t have the liberal arts scene providing a huge counterbalance to the stress).
4)Some, but this is the case for many elite schools, especially publics and engineering oriented schools. Often not as much effort goes into that as much as it does academic and recreational facilities at selective schools.<br>
5)In the beginning, yes, but they aren’t really bigger than most selective schools (who usually have like 250 students in intro, core courses), and certainly much, much, much better than most competitive flagships including Berkeley (can have 4-500 folks in one auditorium). </p>
<p>So that this isn’t all talk about things like the courses: </p>
<p>Let’s compare Berkeley and Tech for some. Often you can measure some degree of rigor of the program by them intro. courses that engineers take:
Physics 1 at Berkeley (physics 7a):
One thing you’ll notice is that Tech gives more exams (quizzes) which means more Berkeley: <a href=“https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/physics/7A/[/url]”>https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/physics/7A/</a>
Tech: [PHYS</a> 2211 ABC Fall 2013](<a href=“http://www.physics.gatech.edu/~em92/Classes/2013/Fall/2211ABC/index.html]PHYS”>http://www.physics.gatech.edu/~em92/Classes/2013/Fall/2211ABC/index.html)</p>
<p>Both are extremely rigorous here, though there appears to be a difference in style. Tech instructors tend to ask stuff from a more conceptual point of view (which is difficult in complex situations), whereas Berkeley is more “prove and derive” oriented.</p>
<p>Hell, I’ll throw in Harvard (and this is the step below the one for engineers. Appears to be more difficult than either. Even the pre-med physics class is harder I think):
[Examinations</a> § Physics 15a (Spring 2010-2011)](<a href=“http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k78854&pageid=icb.page405819]Examinations”>http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k78854&pageid=icb.page405819)</p>
<p>Math 1 (calc. 1):
Tech (rigorous): [MATH</a> 1501](<a href=“http://people.math.gatech.edu/~bonetto/teaching/1501-fall09/ma1501.html]MATH”>MATH 1501)
Berkeley: <a href=“https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/math/1A/[/url]”>https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/math/1A/</a>
Tech is probably harder as that is the one that engineers at Berkeley take.
Harvard, seems more similar: [MATH</a> 1a Home § Mathematics 1a (Spring 2011-2012)](<a href=“http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k83739]MATH”>http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k83739)</p>
<p>Overall, Tech has edge here in rigor.
Chemistry:
Tech (1211k was created like 2-3 years ago? So maybe compare to Berkeley’s 2011-now 1a courses): [CHEM</a> 1211K | Georgia Tech Chemistry & Biochemistry<a href=“the%20only%20thing%20making%20this%20remotely%20hard%20is%20the%20multiple%20choice%20format,%20so%20no%20partial”>/url</a>
Berkeley: <a href=“https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/chem/1A/[/url]”>https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/chem/1A/](<a href=“http://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/academics/freshman-program/chem-1211k]CHEM”>http://www.chemistry.gatech.edu/academics/freshman-program/chem-1211k)</a> (multiple choice same here, seems a little more complex though). </p>
<p>Slight edge to Berkeley.</p>
<p>I’ll compare it to ours (gen. chem is just…generally easy, but ours may be harder because more “application” or conceptual questions are asked and it’s not all MC, which High school students are good at. But at least there is partial credit. Harvard doesn’t have gen. chem anymore):<br>
<a href=“https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BdjE0QklOV0hfVmM/edit[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BdjE0QklOV0hfVmM/edit</a>
<a href=“https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BYzJUbVNTdUI0bUU/edit[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BYzJUbVNTdUI0bUU/edit</a> (a slightly more recent exam)</p>
<p>Biology: if you have to take it for BME or anything:
Tech (apparently this guy is considered one of the more difficult instructors): [Assessing</a> the flipped classroom | Jung’s Biology Blog](<a href=“http://jchoigt.■■■■■■■■■■■■■/2013/03/25/assessing-the-flipped-classroom/]Assessing”>Assessing the flipped classroom | Jung's Biology Blog)
He has an exam there
Berkeley, search from several: <a href=“https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/bio/1A/[/url]”>https://tbp.berkeley.edu/students/exams/bio/1A/</a></p>
<p>Appears the same in general (though the Choi guy from Tech seems more difficult than most of those folks.</p>
<p>Will throw in Emory again (Harvard’s is so over and beyond all of ours that it’s not even useful):
normal professor: <a href=“https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BUFFwQ2kwaWpxdm8/edit[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BUFFwQ2kwaWpxdm8/edit</a>
harder professor: <a href=“https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BMkEwLVN2bnV0VDA/edit[/url]”>https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B456FmeCw42BMkEwLVN2bnV0VDA/edit</a></p>
<p>Emory’s pre-med heavy, so that may explain why we’re harder there.
No need to compare organic chemistry as most engineers won’t need it. But if I were to, Berkeley, Emory, and most other selective institutions are more difficult than Georgia Tech (Berkeley and Georgia Tech seem a lot about the content, and Berkeley teaches more of it, especially semester 2. The private schools seem more about “context” and thus tend to throw tons of curveballs and deep thought q’s, kind of like the physics section at Tech).</p>
<p>The point is: Georgia Tech is as rigorous in some fields as most other top engineering programs and its natural sciences are perhaps the same or less rigorous than more non-engineering schools (the pre-med schools). It’s not overly hard exam and content wise in comparison to most selective schools, it’s just stressful because a majority of students are STEM and the grading practices are stereotypical for STEM (some schools like Harvard and Yale give extra inflation even to science courses by curving to solid “B” or “B+”. Tech and many other schools curve to what is equivalent to a “B-” at most +/- schools, and thus a decent amount of students are still earning C’s). I mean, as long as you don’t overdo it, managing Tech should be challenging, but not “insane” (grading practices for the intro science courses are similar at most selective public schools and even some privates such as Emory, Vanderbilt, Northwestern, Chicago, Johns Hopkins, and Cornell) by any means. Could you imagine places like Harvard without the additional inflationary bump in grading? That would drive someone insane. Most of their STEM classes (at introductory and intermediate) for STEM majors are insane content, workload, and exam wise. Georgia Tech (with exception of math) seems kind of tame. It’s just the environment (not to say an Ivy League environment isn’t intense. It is because the competition and the “one-upping” can go overboard) and the fact that there aren’t as many “fluff” classes to protect the GPA in case you do end up in a very rigorous course.</p>