<p>several off-base comments above:</p>
<p>1) Vanderbilt is a Large University vs. Middlebury an LAC –
Actually, Vanderbilt occupies a middle ground. Vanderbilt has roughly 6,500 undergraduate, 5,500 graduate, for a total of 12,000 students. Compare to truly Large Universities like Berkeley (25,000 undergrad, 10,000 grad, 35,000 total) or Michigan (26,000 undergrad, 16,000 grad, 42,000 total), or even medium universities like Harvard (6,700 undergrad, 12,500 grad = 19,000 total), and you will see Vanderbilt is a rather SMALL University.</p>
<p>2) Middlebury will better prepare for grad school.
I don’t see anywhere that Middlebury, or Pomona, or Bowdoin will better prepare a student for grad school than Vanderbilt, Emory, Rice, Hopkins, Cornell, or other similarly ranked Universities with similarly statted students.
It is undoubtedly true that a higher % of the WASWMPB LAC students in fact go on to earn Ph.D. degrees, but this is more a factor of a higher average family income that LAC students have access to, than any educational pedegogy employed at LACs vs the smallish Universities I referenced above that possess a similar academic rank to Middlebury.</p>
<p>Prestige: well, this is a more difficult issue to resolve. I put the trio of Amherst, Williams and Swarthmore on a par with Chicago, Penn, Columbia, Brown, Cornell. Next you’ve got WashU, Northwestern, Hopkins, Rice, Emory, Vanderbilt, Notre Dame. So where do Middlebury, Pomona, Bowdoin, Carleton fit in my two groupings? In the first group? In the second? In the middle? And notice they are MY GROUPINGS, as that’s the beauty of prestige, it is found only in the eye of the beholder.</p>