Viault vs. PR: European History

<p>Hi,</p>

<p>I am currently in the AP European History course. I have both PR and Modern European History from Viault. As you know, there is only around 2 weeks until the test, and I'm shooting for a 5. </p>

<p>Which book is better for review, PR or Viault? I have read Viault a little, and I find it increasingly boring, however many say that its probably the best guide.</p>

<p>I shuold also mention that I have not remembered too much from the beginning of the year from the course. </p>

<p>So what course of study do you guys suggest?</p>

<p>no one has an idea?</p>

<p>i am in the same dilemna so will one please help?</p>

<p>I will guess PR. It is the one that usually mimics the real tests better. I never heard of Viault. I used REA--I think that's the best. go on amazon.com and read the reviews.</p>

<p>I'm using Viault and the Textbook. I'm really freaking out since I've only gotten up to the Renaissance and the test is in two weeks!! eek. but, i think viault or rea basically covers the details that will be on multiple choice. you have to pick out dates though in the textbook to help "juice" up the frq's. dbq's are basically b.s. and as for princeton review, i think it's not detailed enough. how are you guys studying, as in detail-wise? are you guys spending like hours on each section (cough me cough)? i feel a starbucks-session coming on. damn all the philosophers. they're the worst part.</p>