<p>juliet capulet…seriously?</p>
<p>“I honestly don’t believe one school can somehow attract more attractive people than another school. It’s like saying smart people are all ugly and that blondes are all stupid. There are attractive people everywhere and ugly people everywhere. I don’t think the % of attractive people vs. the % of unattractive ones vary much from school to school. If you’re going to school based on this reason, you should go to drama school. Those students pretty much have to be attractive (there are exceptions, of course, but on the whole, they are).”</p>
<p>This is pretty bad logic. I think I disagree with every single point you’ve tried to make. For one, some schools clearly have more attractively students than others (on the physical level). What I mean is, School A might have a much higher percentage of attractive students than School B. Some schools are of course roughly equal, but other schools blow schools out of the water. It’s like saying that you think all schools have students with roughly the same intelligence. Seriously? Also I have a friend going to drama school, and he informs me that most of the students are nothing close to hot. You forgot that many go to this type of school for the technical or production aspect of drama. This could, of course, only be his school, but I doubt it. </p>
<p>Modulation I would not make it a large factor, but I can certainly see it being another “con” or “pro” on a list taking everything into account. And if two schools were tied in all other aspects, I would not hesitate to pick the school with more attractive students of the opposite sex.</p>