<p>I've looked a lot of past papers and stuff and I have found that the May SAT Writing curve was quite harsh relatively. I just wanted to confirm though.</p>
<p>I saw some other posters from previous tests and most of them got between -6 and -8 and between a 8 and a 10 on the essay and they received around 660. I got -3 and a 8 on the essay (trying to bring that up above 10) and I got a 670. I have a feeling this is very harsh because in the practice tests I usually got -1/-2 and with a predicted 8 essay I got around 750/770.</p>
<p>My search function creates an error so I was unable to find any discussions on the topic, so I apologize.</p>
<p>It wasn’t a harsh curve, but it was still kinda bad. I got 3 wrong and a 10 essay for total of 720. In March I got 3 wrong and an 11 essay and got a 750.</p>
<p>Well based on the Jan Q/A service, yes the May SAT Writing curve was a tad harsh. On the Jan SAT, a 43 raw score and a 9 essay yielded either a 680 or 690. But on the May SAT, it yielded a 660. Darn.</p>
<p>It might have been a bit harder than previous curves, but not by a drastic amount. The increased difficulty of the curve corresponds to what the ETS considers a decreased difficulty in the test questions.</p>
<p>If one wrong was a 76, it was definitely a harsh curve. But, it has certainly happened before (for example in Jan 2009). Most of the variation in the writing curves has to do with the writing MC section; the different essay questions used for each test only contribute a little to differences in the curves.</p>
<p>Wow, so many people got around the range of -6 or -7 and with a 10 essay still got around 680. I feel so bad for getting a 670 with a -3 and a 8 essay. Guess they put a lot more emphasis on the essay than I thought.</p>