Was there ever a time when UC Berkeley was academically better than Stanford?

[ezbreezy]

<p>

@JHS

I’m also a Stanford grad

</p>

<p>Yes, I understand that Stanford Law School was not nearly as selective 30 years ago as it is now. Based on the (lack of) logical content of your posts, I doubt you’d get in nowadays.</p>

<p>

@JHS

The problem with Stanford when I was there was not the quality of the faculty or the graduate students. It was the fact that hardly any undergraduates had much interest in academics, and that mainstream undergraduate culture was pretty anti-intellectual. It was an unbelievable place for any undergraduate who raised his or her hand to get involved in the intellectual life of the university, because there was NO competition from other undergraduates for a place at the table.

</p>

<p>Things have changed since 30 years ago. But don’t let the facts stop you from ■■■■■■■■.</p>

<p>

@JHS

The more things change, the more they stay the same, I guess.

</p>

<p>Are you referring to the fact that even though you’re now ■■■■■■■■ the Stanford forum instead of the Princeton forum (which you usually ■■■■■) that you’re still ■■■■■■■■?</p>