<p>A couple observations.</p>
<p>I don’t think many people are against affirmative action, when truly warranted.</p>
<p>Even a cursory reading of the posts on this thread shows that there are many such examples of deserving kids in this thread.</p>
<p>What I am personally troubled by is giving affirmative action to people who are not financially downtrodden, and who may actually be from rich families, just because they happen to be from an under-represented minority.</p>
<p>For example, I know someone who got into an Ivy who was an “hispanic”, but has suffered no discrimination whatever, comes from a rich family, and in fact, is indistinguishable from a “regular” caucasion. Her grandfather had an hispanic last name. </p>
<p>Should Barack Obama’s kids be given affirmative action? Simply because african americans are an under-represented group? And if so, even if this comes at the expense of a white or asian kid from a poor family? </p>
<p>These are tough issues. In order to have some african american representation at the top schools, it appears that preferences have to be given to kids who come from upper middle class black families.</p>
<p>I do think that colleges have been ignoring the fact that for every “winner” in an affirmative action policy, that there is also a kid on the other side of the scale who is a loser, and that when a coveted spot is awarded to a URM, the background of the kid on the other side of the scale who is losing out should also be looked at. Otherwise, we can have a situation where kids from poor Asian families are being excluded in favor of an african american from an upper middle class family who goes to private school.</p>
<p>I think it is fair to say that AA has sometimes DEVOLVED into a de facto quota system, straying away from its original intent. </p>
<p>Further, how much of a break the URM should be given is another issue. In the famous Bakke case, which involved admission to medical school, it is my understanding that the african american had a C+ average, and the white kid had an A- average.</p>
<p>And even if we still want to admit the kid with the C+ average, do we really want him operating on us??.</p>
<p>Of course, the counter-argument to that is that colleges let unqualified legacies into the top schools all the time.</p>
<p>Anyway, it is a tough issue.</p>
<p>I do have a problem with asians seemingly bearing the brunt of AA policies, with kids with superhuman grades and ECs not getting into the Ivy League, because we have “too many” asians, and “not enough” URMs. While some argue that the fact that asians may be over-represented at the top colleges shows that they are not discriminated against, the fact is that if decisions were based strictly on merit, their representation would probably be double or triple what it is now. Just because Asians make up X % of the population but have 2X representation at top schools does not mean that they are not hurt, and hurt badly, by AA policies, thereby paying the price for discrimination against African Americans that they and their ancestors may not even have played a part in.</p>